Subject:
Title
Paul and G. Eric Dirschka (Bruce Moia) request a zoning classification change from RU-2-10 and RU-1-11 to RU-2-15 (25Z00062) (Tax Account 2216190, 2216168, 2216154, 2216153, 2216155, 2216152, 2216156, 2216151, 2216157, 2216150, 2217403, 2218992, 3021864, 3038147, and 2217400) (District 1)
End
Fiscal Impact:
None
Dept/Office:
Planning and Development
Requested Action:
Recommendation
It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners conduct a public hearing to consider a zoning classification change from RU-2-10 (Medium-Density Multiple-Family Residential) and RU-1-11 (Single-Family Residential) to RU-2-15 (Medium-Density Multiple-Family Residential)
End
Summary Explanation and Background:
The applicant is requesting a change of zoning classification from RU-1-11 (Single-Family Residential) and RU-2-10(5) (Medium-Density Multiple-Family Residential) with a density cap of 5 units per acre to RU-2-15 (Medium-Density Multiple-Family Residential) on 18.07 acres to allow a 270-unit multifamily residential development under the RU-2-15 zoning classification. According to the applicant, the existing single-family residences on the subject property will be removed.
A portion of the subject parcel contains mapped National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) and SJRWMD wetlands and hydric soils, indicating potential wetlands on the property. A state-approved wetland delineation will be required prior to site design, land clearing, or building permit submittal. The property is also located within a Type 1 Aquifer Recharge area, subject to Section 62-3635 and applicable aquifer protection regulations, including septic density limitations; as the property is within the water and sewer service area for the City of Titusville, the applicant is on notice that they may be subject to additional constraints under municipal regulations in order to connect. Additionally, a portion of the parcel lies within FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) Zone A and is therefore subject to applicable floodplain development standards, including compensatory storage requirements.
RU-2-15 classification medium-density multiple-family residential zoning classifications encompass lands devoted to medium-density multifamily residential purposes, together with such accessory uses as may be necessary or are normally compatible with residential surroundings. RU-2-15 permits multiple-family residential uses or single-family residences at a density of up to 15 units per acre on 7,500 square foot lots. This request can be considered an introduction of RU-2-15 zoning into the area. The closest RU-2-15 zoning classification measured from the nearest points of the property lines, is over 4,200 feet (approximately 0.80 miles), located northwest of Columbia Boulevard. RU-2-10 zoning classification is located directly south of the subject property; however, it is capped at 5 units per acre. The other RU-2-10 in the vicinity is also capped at 5 units per acre.
The property to the north of the subject property is a vacant right-of-way. South across the street is a 2.98-acre parcel developed with a single-family home built in 2023. The parcel is zoned RR-1 and RES 15 FLU. East of the subject property is a vacant 11.61-acre parcel zoned RU-2-10 with a density cap of five units per acre. To the northeast lie two (2) 0.19-acre vacant parcels zoned RU-1-1. All three parcels have RES 15 FLU. Lying west of the subject property are four parcels: The first and second properties are 1.39 and 2.58 acres, with both being developed government-managed lands. The third and fourth lots are both vacant 0.19-acre parcels zoned RU-1-11 and RES 15 FLU.
The Board may wish to consider whether the proposed request is consistent and compatible with the surrounding area. The Board may also wish to consider the impact of the more intense multifamily residential zoning, the uses permitted in the RU-2-15 zoning classification on neighboring properties, its compatibility with all policies of the Brevard County Comprehensive Plan, and whether it is an appropriate introduction of a new zoning class to the area.
The Board May wish to consider whether the request is consistent and compatible with the surrounding area. The Board may wish to consider whether the request is consistent with Administrative Policy 3, Administrative Policy 4, and Administrative Policy 7.
On April 13, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Board heard the request and voted 9:1 to recommend approval.
Clerk to the Board Instructions:
Upon receipt of the resolution, please execute and return a copy to Planning and Development.