is nothing on the side of 457 Red Sail Way, and they are able to have theirs as long as the boat
comes in straight forward.
Public comment:
Dawn Ostovich, 449 Red Sail Way, Satellite Beach, subject property owner, stated previously
there was a boat slip and a dock on the property that they had to remove in order to put in the
new seawall, and that total square footage of the boat slip and dock was 750 square feet and it
did not interfere with the neighbor’s property to the southwest. She said she her boat came in
and out of that slip every weekend and there was no interference. The neighbor to the
southwest had a boat slip, but removed everything except the pylons, so both sides were
pulling boats in and out and there was never an issue. She said the new boat slip will be less
than 300 square feet. She said she is not asking for anything out of the ordinary, and she
doesn’t think it is unreasonable.
Curt Chandler, 492 Jolly Roger Drive, Satellite Beach, stated he owns 453 Red Sail Way, and
his parents live there, it is to the west of the subject property. He said his property has a very
small waterfront, at 30 feet. He said it is important that his property line extended straight on
either side, giving a wider view of the waterfront. He said the subject property owners first got a
permit on the left side, the point that is between his property and the subject property, and it’s a
witness point that was 10.25 feet off of the property corner with the shoreline that was
represented as the property line to the homeowner’s association, and represented as the
property corner to the contractor and the County. He said he met with the contractor to ask
about his 10.5 feet that is going to fall into the water, and asked how he was going to protect it.
The contractor’s first response was that it is his clients’ property and they can do what they
want, but subsequently he told him not to worry, that he would take care of it. He said the
contractor threw some rock up there, but it didn’t stop the erosion. He said he felt that was a
problem, so he brought it to the attention of LeeAnn McCullough from Natural Resources who
gave the approval. He said when he pointed out that it was a witness point 10.25 feet off of the
property she immediately wrote a letter of apology and retracted the permit only to go to a
revised permit. He said the permit was granted with the demand that the new seawall be placed
at top of rock revetment, and the contractor said he put it inland and they most certainly did,
they put it inland of that revetment, the new line was on the inside of the revetment; however,
the County’s permit demanded it be at the top, but if you look closely at the drawing and where
the new wall is proposed, then look at this, which is the as-built drawing that they submitted
with the variances, the new seawall is moved in even further.
Mr. Rhodes stated the board is not dealing with the seawall, it is dealing with the dock, and that
is where Mr. Chandler needs to focus.
Mr. Chandler stated the reason he brought up the wall is because they’ve changed the angle of
the wall so that it points even more toward his property and had they left the straight line that
the County plat had, it would be different. He said he does not believe they followed the permit
for building the wall, so he doesn’t believe they will follow a variance. The shoreline was moved
in. He said his mom enjoys the view from the kitchen sink and it is important to her, and if the
variances are approved, his mother’s view from her dream house will be reduced. He said he
does not believe the subject property owners have followed the permit rules; the wall was not
built at the top; the recent seawall construction created erosion problems on both sides; and
they talk about the existing dock, but it was not a lift, which is much more vertical, the existing
dock they mention in the worksheet doesn’t exist, and that’s disingenuous because when they
put in the wall and changed the angle and moved the wall inland they removed all of that, so it
does not exist today. He said the real hardship will be the reduction of view that his mother has
from the kitchen sink, and granting the variances will decrease the value of his property.