past, was the number of schools and students per district; but she thinks it is a great idea and
hopefully they move forward and it does not displace existing School Board members.
Commissioner Feltner remarked he thinks the goal is just simply if one lives in a 100 level
precinct, they are in School Board District 1 and County Commission District 1, if one lives in a
500 level precinct, that tells him immediately they are in School Board District 5 and County
Commission District 5; he knows that makes it a lot easier for the Supervisor of Elections too,
so he thinks they would have some incentive; this is ultimately for the School Board to decide,
but he suspects that there is going to be a mailing from the Supervisor of Elections, maybe
even at the end of this year, prior to the Presidential Preference Primary; he just wonders if the
card could be put in there, or if it has been considered, as they have a lot of mailing equipment
there on John Rhodes Boulevard; and maybe he could pay postage one time.
Chair Pritchett asked Commissioner Tobia if he wanted to go check that out and come back.
Commissioner Tobia replied he would rather punt that one to Commissioner Feltner; he just
does not want the School Board to go in a different direction because a member of the School
Board says this is going to cost $30,000; this is not about being in a 200 precinct; the way he
looks at this, this is for the voter that is able to say they are in School Board District 2 and
automatically know their County Commissioner is in District 2; and it gets extremely
complicated when there are five County Commissioners and five School Board members, but
someone is in a different School Board District than their County Commission District. He went
on to say the fact that the School Board may want to go in that same direction, but the Board
cannot do independently, or mandate them to do that; and if they are voluntarily doing this, he
does not want there to be a financial roadblock, for voter transparency.
Commissioner Feltner stated he agrees 100 percent; he will talk to Mr. Bobanik and see if
maybe the number could be a lot smaller.
Commissioner Zonka mentioned that is good information to provide to Mr. Susin, if he is going
to present it to his board, if the cost is half of that; and she asked if it was going with half or
$30,000.
Commissioner Tobia replied this is extremely important to him, the voter transparency; and if
they were able to get it down to $30,000, if the Board is okay with it, it would come completely
out of his tranche to cover this.
Commissioner Zonka remarked just so Mr. Susin has the information going to his board; and
she thinks the more information he has, the better.
K.6. Kristine Zonka, Commissioner District 5, Vice-Chair, Re: Board Report
Commissioner Zonka stated she wanted to thank the Commission and County staff for a great
six-plus years; they resolved a tremendous amount of issues, some big ones, and the equally
important hundreds of smaller ones; some issue more intensely debated and argued, and
some would drag-out debate, but always researched, thoughtful, and fought with equally as
much passion; she cannot express enough gratitude to the County Manager, the staff, and the
County, too many to list, because she had a list in her head and she did not want to hurt
anyone’s feelings if she missed anybody; and many became easy friends over time and
quickly. She added she is fortunate to be able to continue working with them, just in a different
capacity, as that is a plus; her chief of staff, Danielle Stern, is a rock star and the County in
District 5 is better because of the hard-working commitment; Janett Roig is the sunshine and
gatekeeper, keeping them all laughing on a daily basis, and keeps it running like a well-oiled
machine; she manages the calm and angry, or puts someone in their place when they need to
be; and Charlene Brown, within the first month in her office, picked-up on things quicker than