Brevard County Board of County Commissioners  
2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way  
Viera, FL 32940  
Minutes  
Tuesday, August 6, 2024  
5:00 PM  
Regular  
Commission Chambers  
A.  
CALL TO ORDER 5:00 PM  
Commissioner District 1 Rita Pritchett, Commissioner District 2  
Tom Goodson, Commissioner District 3 John Tobia,  
Commissioner District 4 Rob Feltner, and Commissioner District 5  
Jason Steele  
Present:  
C.  
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE  
Commissioner Tobia led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance.  
F.1. Assignment Agreement Change Approval - Singhofen & Associates, Inc. to Halff  
Associates, Inc.  
Sandra Sullivan stated she is very grateful for the work that this company has done; she  
understands that they are being acquired, so it is great that the County is amending this  
contract; she would like to point out some of their very good work; she provided the Board with  
a document showing the company’s 10-year flood plan for North Merritt Island; and as the  
County looks to the work and storm sewage on that, it needs to pay attention to what is in their  
hydrology study that the County spend a half a million dollars, and actually used these reports,  
instead of just all growth and not paying attention to the implications of growth in those areas.  
F.2. Scope of Work and Budget Allocation for the Eau Gallie Northeast Muck Removal  
Project  
Sandra Sullivan commented that this gives her so much heartburn; this is regarding the Eau  
Gallie Muck Project and changing the specification work; this was a $26 million project that was  
for 750,000 cubic yards of muck; the quote came in for half of that amount, almost $50 million;  
the issue here is, rather than fixing what is causing this problem, the County is pumping muck  
8.1 miles down to Palm Bay; that is what is causing the ridiculous price, so instead the County  
is going to play games; it is going to reduce the amount of muck they are going to pump to  
250,000 cubic yards; and it is going to remove the interstitial cleanup, so the cleaning up of the  
nutrient loading that goes back into the Lagoon, is going to be taken out. She continued by  
saying oh, but wait, it says the County will do a change order later and add it back in again; all it  
is, is manipulating numbers to make something look good that is not good; this project needs to  
be changed to reflect the overall problem, which is the County is pumping muck 8.1 miles  
because it wants to give Sarno to a city, the Sarno land that has historically been the place the  
County has put that muck; it is not just this one project, she is talking over $100 million just for  
this found; and future costs will be hundreds of millions of dollars, because there are a lot more  
projects in this vicinity. She pointed out the optics of this is not good at all.  
F.3. Westgate Agreement Between Westgate Cocoa Beach Pier, LLC, the City of  
Cocoa Beach, and Brevard County Florida  
Sandra Sullivan advised what this County does for the developers, the backflips it does drives  
her absolutely nuts; she asked the Commissioners if he or she had seen the news about  
Westgate laying off about 300 people, or whatever; they are not doing so good; she provided  
the Board with some pictures of South Patrick Residents Association (SPRA) Park; she stated  
this is for the sand re-nourishment project that they just had; and she asked if the Board can  
see how wide those projects are, as they are not 20 feet wide. She went on by saying previous  
the County had a 40-foot width or 50-foot width to be able to access to put sand in that area; of  
course, Cocoa Beach is a major tourist location; this has been priority for sand for the County;  
she asked if the Board knows that under its sand re-nourishment permits with the Federal  
Government that these trucks cannot stay on the beach at night; she noted they have to come  
up; and she asked where the County is going to put them. She asked if the County is going to  
narrow that to a little, narrow pathway, where are the trucks going to be put; have the  
Commissioners really thought this out; and she remarked she did not think so.  
Commissioner Goodson asked what kind of trucks Ms. Sullivan is talking about.  
Ms. Sullivan replied they had four articulating, big sand trucks; and they had diggers to put the  
sand . . .  
Commissioner Goodson advised those are excavators.  
Ms. Sullivan stated yeah, okay.  
Commissioner Goodson asked if Ms. Sullivan had ever seen an excavator go down the road.  
Ms. Sullivan replied yes, they go on a flatbed.  
Commissioner Goodson commented correct, and the road is 12-foot wide, the excavator’s  
eight, transports are eight, off-road trucks are eight; and he asked if there is a 20-foot  
easement, where is this going to restrict the County from getting in there.  
Ms. Sullivan remarked it is not restricting them getting in there, it is how they are stored when  
they come off of the beach at night.  
Commissioner Goodson pointed out they would not bring an excavator off of the beach at night,  
they are pulled up on the dunes for it to be there the next day; and off-road trucks are the same  
way.  
Ms. Sullivan noted except one has to have room to put them; and she asked if they will be put  
in line down a row.  
Commissioner Goodson stated they would be put down the beach in a line.  
Ms. Sullivan mentioned it is just common sense.  
Commissioner Goodson exclaimed common sense is one does not move that equipment every  
night.  
Ms. Sullivan advised the County’s Federal permit requires it.  
F.1. Assignment Agreement Change Approval, Re: Singhofen & Associates, Inc. to Halff  
Associates, Inc. (continued)  
The Board approved and executed an Assignment of Agreement for Engineering Consultant  
Services from Singhofen and Associates, Inc. to Halff Associates, Inc.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele  
F.2. Scope of Work and Budget Allocation, Re: Eau Gallie Northeast Muck Removal  
Project (continued)  
The Board approved amending the scope of work for the Eau Gallie Northeast Muck Removal  
Project to focus on removing muck from areas with the highest nutrient flux, using Save Our  
Indian River Lagoon (SOIRL) Trust Funds allocated for both muck removal and interstitial  
treatment to bid dredging without interstitial treatment; authorized staff to negotiate and the  
County Manager to execute change orders to removal more muck and/or add interstitial  
treatment to the contract if the negotiated cost is reasonable and sufficient funds are available  
or become available; and extended the same flexibility and approach to all muck removal  
projects approved in the SOIRL Project Plan, as necessary, so projects can move forward  
within their allocated budgets.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele  
F.3. Approval, Re: Westgate Agreement Between Westgate Cocoa Beach Pier, LLC, the  
City of Cocoa Beach, and Brevard County, Florida (continued)  
The Board authorized the Chair to execute the Westgate Agreement between Westgate Cocoa  
Beach Pier, LLC, the City of Cocoa Beach, and Brevard County to facilitate the City Council’s  
desire to vacate a portion of Meade Avenue, while at the same time preserving public access,  
construction access, and other rights essential to the Brevard County Shore Protection Project,  
subject to final approval by the County Attorney’s Office.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele  
F.4. Florida Department of Transportation Resolution for the Previously Approved  
Joint Participation Agreement for cost-sharing and nutrient credit sharing of the  
Sykes Creek Zone N Septic-to-Sewer Project (District 2).  
The Board executed and adopted Resolution No. 24-070, for the previously approved Joint  
Participation Agreement with FDOT for the cost-sharing and nutrient credit sharing of the  
Sykes Creek Zone N Septic-to-Sewer Project.  
Result: ADOPTED  
Mover: Rob Feltner  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
F.5. Final Plat and Contract Approval, Re: Landings at Viera  
Developer: Condev Pineda Investors I, LLC  
District 4  
The Board granted final plat approval; and authorized the Chair to sign the Final Plat and  
Infrastructure Contract for Landings at Viera - Developer: Condev Pineda Investors I, LLC,  
subject to minor changes, as applicable, and developer responsible for obtaining all other  
necessary jurisdictional permits.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
F.6. Permission to advertise for the repeal of Ordinance 89-29 - State Road 46 Water  
Extension #1 (District 1).  
The Board granted permission for the Utility Services Director to advertise for the repeal of  
Brevard County Ordinance No. 89-29 – State Road 46 Water Extension #1.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
F.7. Approval, HUD Urban County Agreements and Requalification for FY 2025, 2026,  
and 2027  
The Board approved the Urban County Agreement Re-Qualification with the U.S. Department  
of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to receive Community Development Block Grant  
(CDBG) and HOME funds; approved the continuance of Cooperative Agreements with seven  
municipalities consisting of Cocoa Beach, Indialantic, Indian Harbour Beach, Melbourne Village,  
Palm Shores, Rockledge, and Satellite Beach for Fiscal Years 2025, 2026, and 2027;  
authorized the County Attorney to send the mandatory letter to HUD; and authorized the  
Housing and Human Services Director to transmit the renewed Agreements and any supporting  
documents to HUD.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
F.8. Approval, Re: Budget Change Request  
The Board reviewed and approved the Budget Change Request (BCR).  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
F.9. Appointment(s) / Reappointment(s)  
The Board appointed/reappointed Donald Lusk to the Brevard County Library System Advisory  
Board, with term expiring December 31, 2025; Josiah Gattle to the Economic Development  
Commissioner of Florida’s Space Coast, with term expiring December 31, 2024; Stacy Landon  
to the Historical Commission, with term expiring December 31, 2025; Melissa Jackson, as  
alternate, to the Planning and Zoning Board, with term expiring December 31, 2026; Ana  
Saunders, and Robert Wise, as alternate, to the Planning and Zoning Board, with terms  
December 31, 2025; and Jessica Curry and Warren Bradford Whitmore, Jr. to the  
Titusville-Cocoa Airport Authority, with terms expiring August 6, 2027.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
F.10. Bill Folder  
The Board acknowledged receipt of the Bill Folder.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
G.  
PUBLIC COMMENTS (Individuals may not speak under both the first and second  
public comment sections.)  
Louie Hanna stated he has lived on East Crisafulli Road for 28 years, retired after 30 years at  
the Space Center, he is an Army veteran, and he has a problem with the speed bumps on East  
Crisafulli Road; they heard about these soon to be installed speed bumps just a couple of  
weeks before they were to be installed; it was a done deal, they were coming, and to deal with  
it; and it kind of felt like the residents were not supposed to know about it beforehand, or until it  
was too late to do anything about it. He went on to say upon inquiring about why no one knew  
about the speed humps prior, he was told that the only ones affected were the ones who voted  
for it, the address is within the first one-half mile from Courtenay to Judson; the residents east  
of Judson to the end of East Crisafulli and all of the connecting streets were unaffected;  
because they were unaffected, not one person east of Judson, on Crisafulli, or tributaries had a  
vote or any say in the matter at all; they were just going to be put in and that was it; this is his  
home being talked about here; his Commissioner, Mr. Goodson, old him they could use Judson  
Road, thereby eliminating the necessity to drive over the speed bumps all together; Judson is a  
dirt road; in the dry season, it is a dusty as a washboard road; and in the wet season, it is a  
mud road. He noted if the residents wanted to traverse a dirt road on a daily basis, they could  
have bought cheaper property on a dirt road; to his way of thinking, when something is  
arbitrarily taken away, what is offered in return should be equal to or better than what they lost;  
he asked the County to pave Judson; he asked why punish everyone for the sins of the few; he  
remarked to catch the guys who are speeding, and put cops out there; the name on a  
document authorizing the installation of speed bumps is the same name that appeared on at  
least one of the company trucks on the job site the day of installation; he asked who provided  
the asphalt; and is this a conflict of interest. He pointed out at the very least, it is what is called  
bad optics in today’s world; the resident who initiated this process was overheard boasting at  
the local convenience store about how he had gotten traffic slowed down on East Crisafulli, that  
he had pulled some strings of the buddy at the County to get speed bumps installed; but he  
was unable to get them installed past Judson; he thought his County Commissioner’s job was  
to help the citizenry he represents to make life better; this is not better; this is insulting and  
divisive; East Crisafulli Road has been his home for over 28 years; do not tell him he is  
unaffected; and they are all affected.  
Commissioner Goodson advised this was voted on with former Commissioner Lober; in the  
County Code, and the County Manager can correct him if he is wrong, it says 85 percent right  
now that front the property where the speed bumps go; and he asked if that is correct.  
Marc Bernath, Public Works Director, responded there is a BCC that covers that; they sent out  
the petition; and it met the threshold.  
Commissioner Goodson asked if it is true that the people that are voting right now, unless the  
Ordinance is changed, if it is the people who front Crisafull Road.  
Mr. Bernath replied correct.  
Commissioner Goodson asked not the people that live a block off or a mile off on another  
street, correct.  
Mr. Bernath responded that is correct.  
Commissioner Goodson asked if these were approved by former Commissioner Lober, correct.  
Mr. Bernath responded he does not know offhand; and he was not prepared to answer that  
tonight.  
Commissioner Goodson inquired therefore, if the County is going to allow Mr. Hanna here, the  
Code would have to be changed, correct.  
Mr. Bernath replied it is a BCC, it is not a Code.  
Commissioner Goodson asked what a BCC is.  
Mr. Bernath advised it is a Board Policy.  
Commissioner Goodson asked if the Board would have to change it.  
Mr. Bernath responded affirmatively.  
Commissioner Goodson stated if he is not mistaken, the people east of Mr. Hanna voted to . . .  
Mr. Hanna noted no, they did not.  
Commissioner Goodson stated that Mr. Hanna say they did not; but he was under the  
impression they voted to for when they pave the road they want speed humps; Mr. Hanna is  
saying no; and he is going to agree with all of them.  
Terrence White commented he lives on Joseph Court, which is a road off of Crisafulli; Mr.  
Hanna covered a lot of the points he has; but in doing some research, a lot of the problems  
with speed humps that people have not even discussed; they slow down the response of  
emergency vehicles; being a former fire fighter, he knows what it is like to go over bumps in a  
big fire truck; and it also includes transporting someone in an ambulance after the fact, as the  
ambulance cannot leave the area in a hurry because of the humps. He went on to say one of  
the things that he witnessed for years in areas that do have speed humps is when a school bus  
goes over there, the children in the backseat gets launched almost to the ceiling of the school  
bus; he asked the Board Members to follow a school bus in a neighborhood that has speed  
humps; along with Mr. Hanna, no one, east of Judson, was questioned about the speed humps;  
he did not find out about them until he drove down the road and they were in the process of  
installing them; and it causes excess wear on the vehicles. He added one of the issues he sees  
as well is people down there have livestock, horses, goats, and cattle; they play heck going  
over those bumps with animals in their trailers; a lot of animals are spooked in a trailer anyway;  
and it also plays on the suspension of the trailers. He stated while he is up here he would like to  
request that the speed humps on Joseph Court to be removed; there are 15 residents on that  
street; 14 of them told him that they want them removed; in doing research on the ones on  
Crisafulli, he found a thing that says speed humps cannot be installed on a dead-end road; and  
Joseph Court is a dead-end road.  
Robert Adams mentioned he has lived on Crisafulli Road for 40 years; he is here to make a  
citizens request, which he was told to do, for a petition to remove the speed humps; whatever  
that package is, that is what they are trying to get a hold of, which is why they are here  
speaking; five speed humps have been installed in less than one-half a mile, from Courtenay to  
Judson; and Crisafulli Road is only two miles long with a bunch of other roads on it. He  
continued by saying according to County Policy, the benefited and affected areas are the ones  
that are supposed to be checked out before putting speed bumps in; everyone on that road  
uses Crisafuli every single day; every time he leaves his house twice, he goes over 20 speed  
bumps; he would love the Commission to put 20 speed bumps around his or her house and see  
how much it is enjoyed; other than that, they were told by Commissioner Goodson to drive  
down Judson; that is not what he moved out there for 40 years ago; he moved out there to get  
away from Homeowners Associations (HOAs); and they finally found him. He advised he does  
not appreciate the detrimental effects, or whatever one wants to say; he inquired when it comes  
to the logistics of it, how many of the affected homeowners signed off on a petition to use their  
tax money to put in those speed bumps; he pointed out he did not; he has never been asked in  
40 years whether or not he wanted speed bumps; the detrimental effects is the community is  
torn apart; they used to be friendly people and wave at each other, and people stopped and  
looked at each other’s Christmas lights; now they flip one off every time he or she goes by the  
house on the corner; and it is not too hard to figure out that it is not really much of a bring it  
together package. He noted property values are impacted, school buses, and damage to his  
cars; he is not taking his trailers with a thousand dollars’ worth of equipment over five speed  
humps just to leave his home every day; it is not the way to do business; he asked why were  
the unnotified homeowners possibly have to use their personal funds to remove those speed  
bumps, which is in the County’s package deal; and he asked the Commissioners want to drive  
over five speed bumps every time he or she leaves their home; and he stated that is five in and  
five out.  
Commissioner Goodson asked if he wants to remove the speed bumps, and he ran a survey of  
all of the people who live on Crisafulli and off of Crisafulli, would he agree if they voted for  
speed humps.  
Mr. Adams replied no; he has a hundred and some odd signatures here . . .  
Commissioner Goodson stated to hang on and let him finish the question, because the first  
people who voted that lived on Crisafulli, only one said no; and everybody else said speed  
bumps.  
Mr. Adams remarked fine.  
Commissioner Goodson asked if he ran a survey and everybody that lived off and on Crisafulli  
said they wanted or did not want speed humps would Mr. Adams agree with the vote at the  
end.  
Mr. Adams replied yes, very much so, as that is logical.  
Alan Miles asked why is there no urgency to put a traffic light at the intersection between Viera  
High School and the new middle school; he stated there are veterans leaving the Veterans  
Clinic, seniors from Sonata East, and a wet surface from the car wash; there are high school  
students making u-turns, golf carts, and walkers all diverging on this intersection; it is slated for  
a light beginning the 2025 school year he believes; and if safety is the main concern of the  
Commission, then get a light. He advised temporary ones in the Palm Bay Heritage High  
School are being installed; he has some information on this system; and he asked if anyone  
knows what is going on with the traffic lights there.  
Chair Steele explained the Public Comment section is for him to go ahead and give the Board  
his comments; and it is not a question and answer situation.  
Commissioner Feltner noted out of respect for his constituent, he would like Mr. Bernath speak  
to the light project that is happening out there; and he knows there have been many  
conversations with the schools about it.  
Mr. Bernath stated the School District is actively designing this light; staff is contributing to it; he  
does not have the actual design schedule at his disposal; but they are planning on putting it in  
sometime later this year; staff anticipates by the end of the year, he would say, to have that put  
in; and he reiterated it is something the County would anticipate them doing later on this year.  
Mr. Miles pointed out it still does not meet the safety qualification of being installed before the  
school year.  
Chair Steele advised the Board is not going to get into a question and answer service;  
Commissioner Feltner asked Mr. Bernath for a response; and he gave it to Mr. Miles.  
Commissioner Feltner stated everyone is actively working on it, and also by Viera Elementary,  
which is something he inherited; and he has been working on that since he got on the  
Commission.  
H.1. Petition to Vacate, Re: Public Utility & Drainage Easements - 466 Newfound  
Harbor Drive - “Revised Gateway Unit No. 2” Plat Book 19, Page 112 - Merritt  
Island - Shani Murphy and Todd P. O’Brien - District 2  
Chair Steele called for a public hearing to consider a petition to vacate public utility and  
drainage easements located in Revised Gateway Unit No. 2, Merritt Island, as petitioned by  
Shani Murphy and Todd P. O’Brien.  
Richard Bitner stated this thing is absolutely a monstrosity; he provided pictures to the Board  
showing the scope and size of this; he explained as the Board can see, that is him standing  
along in that structure; it is huge; it is almost as big as the house; that is a side view; there are  
safety issues on this as well; and the Board can see where the roof is collapsing. He advised  
there is no privacy; he provided a picture to the Board of when they are standing on their deck,  
what they look at; he noted he wants privacy in his yard; every single time they step on their  
thing, that is what he has to look at; it is just too big; and it is the size of their house. He pointed  
out it does not pass zoning; they have already said it is against Policy; here they are wasting  
their time when it should have been torn down a year ago; they have been at this for a year;  
and he reiterated he just wants his privacy. He stated they are up there two feet, he has to look  
at two feet of their bodies every time they step on top of that structure; the thing is like 50 feet  
long; it is terrible; it is just too big; it needs to come down or be modified; but it is not fun going  
out into his yard to swim, and he has to look at them.  
Commissioner Goodson asked how long Mr. Bitner has lived there.  
Mr. Bitner replied five years.  
Commissioner Goodson asked if this undoubtedly been a problem for only the last year.  
Mr. Bitner responded there have been other issues; but the subject is on this structure; they  
have gone to court; they had a privacy fence that was eight feet tall that was removed; it was  
on his property; they had it removed and put a new six-foot fence, the white fence the Board  
saw, they put it on their property, so they took away two feet of their privacy; and they tried  
talking to them, but it was their way and only their way.  
Marc Bernath, Public Works Director, stated it is a public petition to vacate two public utility and  
drainage easements to allow for the existing covered deck to remain and become compliant  
with the Code Enforcement case; the petitioner is requesting for five foot vacate on both the  
north and west size; and that is at the discretion of the Board to honor that or not; and if so,  
then the petitioner would then go before the Board of Adjustment to seek a variance.  
Chair Steele asked if this is Commissioner Goodson’s District; and he asked if he would like to  
make a recommendation.  
Commissioner Goodson replied he would like to make a motion to approve.  
There being no further comments or objections, the Board adopted Resolution No. 24-XXX,  
vacating public utility and drainage easements located in Revised Gateway Unit No. 2 in Merritt  
Island, as requested by Shani Murphy and Todd P. O’Brien.  
Result: ADOPTED  
Mover: Tom Goodson  
Seconder: John Tobia  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele  
H.2. Approval of Revisions to Ordinance No. 98-37, also known as Chapter 2, Article  
VII of the Brevard County Code of Ordinances, entitled “Construction and  
Improvement of Public Buildings.”  
Chair Steele called for a public hearing to consider revisions to Ordinance 98-37, also known  
as chapter 2, Article VII, Brevard County Code of Ordinances, entitled Construction and  
Improvement of Public Buildings.  
Kathy Wall, Central Services Director, stated it is requested that the Board approve the  
revisions to Chapter 2, Article VII, of the Brevard County Code of Ordinances, Construction and  
Improvement to Public Buildings.  
Chair Steele stated he listened to this during briefings, and he was extremely pleased with this.  
There being no comments or objections, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 24-18, amending  
Chapter 2, Article VII of the Brevard County Code of Ordinances, entitled “Construction and  
Improvement of Public Buildings”; amending Section 2-226, Brevard County Code, entitled  
“Definitions”, to define certain terms; amendment Section 2-227, Brevard County Code, entitled  
“Award of Contracts Generally”, to increase the minimum dollar threshold of certain public  
projects from $50,000 to $200,000; amending Section 2-228, Brevard County Code, entitled  
“Prequalification and Competitive Bidding”; amending Section 2-229, Brevard County Code,  
entitled “Qualifications of Bidders”; amending Section 2-230 entitled, “Debarment”; providing for  
inclusion in the Code; providing for conflicting provisions; providing for severability; and  
providing for an effective date.  
Result: ADOPTED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele  
H.3. Approval of Revisions to Board Policy BCC-28, “Pre-Qualification of Construction  
Bidders Prior to Award.”  
Chair Steele called for a public hearing to consider revisions to Board Policy BCC-28,  
Pre-Qualification of Construction Bidders Prior to Award.  
Kathy Wall, Central Services Director, commented this requires the acceptance of public  
comment on the revisions to the Board Policy BCC-28, Pre-Qualification of Construction  
Bidders Prior to Award.  
There being no comments or objections, the Board accepted public comment on the revisions  
to Board Policy BCC-28; and approved the revisions to BCC-28, Pre-qualification of  
Construction Bidders Prior to Award.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Tom Goodson  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele  
I.1.  
Board Discussion and Direction Regarding Negotiations with City of Melbourne  
Concerning Sarno Road Landfill Property  
Frank Abbate, County Manager, commented staff has given the Board some items so they can  
get some Board direction after discussions with the City of Melbourne, they were not interested  
in the purchase of the property; however, there were questions about whether or not the Board  
might be interested in leasing a portion of it, and/or selling or leasing a portion of it for purposes  
of affordable housing; the third area was whether or not the board wanted to sell a portion of  
that land to the City at some point in the future, so the Board will see that outlined in the  
Agenda Item; the Board can either say yes it is interested in any of those three items, or  
indicate that it would be interested in it if it was a package; and either way, staff is looking for  
Board direction. He went on to say if the board would choose not to do any of those things,  
then staff did put a second item if the Board would be interested, in light of what happened in  
prior Board discussions, the use of Wickham Park for Renaissance Fair whether or not it would  
interested in staff trying to reach out to them for a short-term lease, one year or less, for use for  
the coming year; the third option would be any other direction the Board might have for staff;  
and he did receive an email from the City Manager right before the meeting indicating that what  
she read in the Agenda was consistent with staff’s discussions.  
Sandra Sullivan stated this is going to cost taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars this site  
has been not only used for a Dredged Material Management Area (DMMA) site, it has also  
been used and is required 15 acres for hurricane debris; she provided a picture of the aerial  
showing how much of the site that was used before; she noted the math does not work, the  
County only leaving eight right now; there is no appraisal in the Agenda Item; and there should  
have been a couple of appraisals. She added, the City inquired whether the Board might be  
willing to consider a long-term lease of the site with a relatively nominal value; that is not  
allowed; she gave the Board a legal opinion previously; it was very clear from the meeting that  
they do not want to pay for the land; only Mayor Paul Alfrey, City of Melbourne, was pushing  
making points that they can lease Sarno for $1 a year for 99 years; he said the County really  
wants to get rid of it; and the County does not need the Sarno land, which obviously it does.  
She advised the optics of this are not good; there was a hit piece that dropped this week; when  
digging into who is the pack that funded that; and one will find out that it is the entity across the  
road; it is very common knowledge in Brevard County that he did not want the affordable  
housing across the street on that property; she asked is this a trade for a three-acre piece of  
property for a 57-acre piece; she reiterated the optics do not look good on this at all; and when  
this first came up, there was a campaign contribution to a Commissioner. She pointed out this  
is not good for the people; the County is not following its own rules on appraisals as far as she  
can see; it has one appraisal; it cannot be discussed leasing land for $1 a year for 99 years;  
this is utility land; this was purchased with bonds; there are rules and State Statutes; and this  
stinks, has really bad optics, and usually in the past things would have a tendency when one  
brings it before this Board, they would tend to go away once it has been exposed. She stated  
she does not get this Board; it just seems like even with things that are brought forward, there  
is no shame anymore; and there is no shame for the will of the people of what he or she wants.  
Jeffrey Njus, Executive Director of Daily Bread, stated he wanted to very simply express their  
openness to the possibilities that have been put forward; he is what one may call an indirect  
party to the negotiations; he wanted to provide a little bit of clarity that they would be open to  
the possibility of a long-term lease; they are indifferent to whether the property is owned or  
leased ty them; and he is grateful for the County to step in and address this Countywide  
challenge of the problem of affordable housing. He went on by saying he is grateful for the kind  
of creative solutions to this need; and he is available for any questions.  
Commissioner Pritchett expressed her appreciation to Mr. Njus, as he has a great mission, and  
he impacts a lot of people; and she stated she wanted him to know she appreciates it.  
Commissioner Feltner stated he wanted to make a motion to lease directly to Renaissance Fair  
for the next season; and then any other thing that happens with this parcel is something maybe  
the next Board can discuss in the future.  
Chair Steele passed the gavel to Vice Chair Pritchett.  
Commissioner Steele stated he would second Commissioner Feltner’s motion.  
Vice Chair Pritchett passed the gavel back to Chair Steele.  
Commissioner Tobia advised this came out of his office; as a little background, he wants to  
thank the County Manager and the County Attorney, as they worked very diligently on this; he  
had some discussions with the Mayor of Melbourne; clearly he was observing Sunshine,  
because Mayor Alfrey had no idea where his board was going to go; and he had no idea where  
this Board was going to go. He pointed out the County Manager did with the instruction of this  
Board was to go out and get an appraisal of that land; it came back at far more than what he  
would have expected; the City of Melbourne had an appraisal done; theirs came back even  
higher than the County’s appraisal; then the offer was made for an exchange for road  
maintenance, so they could amortize this cost over 20 years; clearly, the other elected officials  
in Melbourne were not too intrigued with that plan; that is okay; and he fully-supports that  
decision. He stated there were a bunch of other decision points in there about parceling up this  
land; he would support the way the motion and the second are going on that; he thinks the  
Board needs to close the door on parceling this off; he does not know what sections of that 57  
acres they would want, the sections the County may use, the dry sections, or anything like that,  
so if the County was going to go in an exchange for some road maintenance and the whole  
parcel was being dealt, that would be okay; but as far as parceling it up, he does not think there  
is any more need for staff to continue negotiations based on what it received back; and he  
would not be in favor of a long-term lease with the City of Melbourne for $1 or $1,000, as he  
just does not think it would benefit the County in any nature. He reiterated he will support that  
motion and the second as long as the Board puts some sort of termination; clearly, the County  
is not going to meet the City with what they are looking for; Commissioner Feltner just has a  
creative way to help out some live LARPers out there playing in some costumes; he would  
certainly support that as long as there were some clear provisions in there with that lease;  
obviously, the Parks and Recreation Director would put in play that just costs, certain cleanup  
be done, and a market rate be done; the Board needs to be very clear that entrance, exit, and  
all of that stuff is outside; the entrance is not County land, that needs to be handled and  
permitted through the City of Melbourne, so the County can offer the lease but it cannot  
guarantee anything that is going on; and he would like added in the motion, and he hopes this  
would be friendly, that the Board would not go any further with negotiations with the City of  
Melbourne, as the County and City are too far apart, because the City is not interested in that  
type of deal, as well as the provisions with the Renaissance Fair that the County sets just cost  
and all that good stuff.  
Commissioner Feltner advised he will accept that as a friendly amendment if Commissioner  
Tobia wants to restate that to make it clear for the Clerk.  
Commissioner Tobia stated the amendment would be to terminate the negotiations with the  
City of Melbourne.  
Commissioner Feltner asked what if the Renaissance Fair pays the same rate as last year at  
Wickham Park for this next season coming at the Sarno property.  
Mr. Abbate noted he would say the Board would be looking at the all-in cost in terms of what  
they paid for the permit; they also had a variety of camping that was going on, Recreational  
Vehicles (RVs), et cetera that they did, so the County has an all-in cost for that; and in the  
current motions, as well as in the Agenda Item, all ancillary costs, cleanup, et cetera would also  
be included in whatever would be the terms, so it would be under the same terms for the period  
of time that the County collected the revenues from the Wickham Park situation, and the  
ancillary costs as well.  
Commissioner Tobia stated so the additions are number one, to terminate negotiations with the  
City of Melbourne; and number two, to use the revisions in the staff report to have a similar fee  
schedule as last year for the Renaissance Fair, which hopefully that would be a friendly  
amendment.  
Commissioner Feltner remarked he would accept that friendly amendment.  
Commissioner Pritchett commented since this is a different area for them, she is sure they are  
going to have to do some clearing and setting up; and she asked if that is going to be on their  
dime as well.  
Commissioner Feltner replied it is his understanding that any site work prep would be up to  
them.  
Commissioner Pritchett pointed out she just wanted to double check.  
Mr. Abate advised the work prep, the cost would be on the Renaissance Fair.  
Chair Steele noted all of that will be included in the lease.  
Mr. Abbate asked as a cost paid by the person who is leasing it, right.  
Chair Steele replied yes; and he called for a vote on the motion.  
The Board directed staff to terminate negotiations with the City of Melbourne; and approved  
leasing the Sarno Landfill property directly to the Renaissance Fair for a period not to exceed  
one year with a similar fee schedule and terms as was utilized at Wickham Park between  
County Parks and Recreation and the Renaissance Fair, with the Renaissance Fair being  
solely and exclusively responsible for complying with all County and City special events  
permitting requirements, and any and all other costs associated with the Fair being held on  
leased property.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Rob Feltner  
Seconder: Jason Steele  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele  
J.1. Approval, Re: Contract with Keep Brevard Beautiful for SR 406 Max Brewer  
Causeway, SR 528 Beachline Causeway, SR518 Eau Gallie Causeway, HWY 192  
Melbourne Causeway, and SR 404 Pineda Causeway Clean Up  
Commissioner Pritchett stated Items J.1. and J.2. are very closely related; she asked if they  
can be discussed together; she advised both contracts are working in collaboration with Keep  
Brevard Beautiful (KBB); she thinks the County should have one contract with KBB on all of the  
projects rather than having Cocoa Beach as a middleman for SR 520 Causeway and the Beach  
cleanup project; Item J.1. has the Max Brewer Causeway in the Titusville area, the 192  
Causeway in Melbourne, the Beachline, and it just makes sense to put them all together  
instead of separating out SR 520; and after a discussion, she would like to make a motion to  
approve and authorize the Tourism Development Commission Director to sign a three-year  
contract with a two-year extension with KBB beginning October 1, 2024, for the six causeway  
projects, plus the beach cleanup for the annual amount added together $417,184 per year,  
subject to the County Attorney, Risk management, and Purchasing Services approval. She  
added, the funds for SR 520 Causeway and cleanup would come from the Tourist Beach Fund  
under the Sections 102-119(3)b and (4)a of the County Code; the funds for the five other  
causeway projects will still come from the Lagoon portion of the Beach Fund under Section  
102-1194 of the Code; adopt the legislative findings at that time for the requested action for  
these, so that is just an idea to put them both together; and she thinks it would serve KBB; and  
then the Board would be able to take Cocoa Beach out of that as a middleman and just get all  
of the projects done.  
Chair Steele pointed out that is sure going to put a stick in the wheels here; he would have to  
find out whether or not Cocoa Beach and Keep Brevard Beautiful would be interested in doing  
that; and in the interest of saving time, he asked Wayne Carragino, City Manager of Cocoa  
Beach, if he has a problem with that.  
John Nico, Keep Brevard Beautiful, stated he does not have a problem with this; and he thinks  
this would be a good idea.  
Mr. Carragino replied not at all; and it makes sense actually to be honest.  
Sandra Sullivan commented almost every single week, Water Warriors is out cleaning up  
Pineda Causeway; their volunteers are so impressive; she provided the Board with a picture of  
one of their posts on social media; they are doing other causeways and other roads; and they  
have put receptacles all along the Causeway so when people go fishing or are recreating at this  
side of the Causeway, they are putting their trash in there. She went on to say these people  
work so hard, it is so impressive; the County is giving almost $37,000 to KBB; it does not  
cleanup Pineda Causeway, Waterway Warriors does; they have been working with Natural  
Resources Management, which know what they are doing; they are going down into the  
Lagoon and picking up stuff; the Board would not believe what they pick up; and there is no  
consideration here for Waterway Warriors. She noted they have been for two years now  
cleaning up Pineda Causeway on a weekly basis; she asked the Board Members to drive down  
there sometime and he or she will see all kinds of trash bags at the side of the road with their  
volunteer sign; on the sign on Pineda Causeway it says ‘Adopt a Highway, Pineda Waterway  
Warriors’; she asked what the County is doing here; and she stated it is not acknowledging  
people who work really hard, volunteers who are out there every weekend picking up trash.  
Commissioner Feltner explained that this Board adopted a Resolution in recognition of the  
Waterway Warriors; he thinks they are an amazing group that goes out there an cleans up;  
they called him on a Saturday morning, and he got Roads and Bridge out there and picked up  
the remains of what must have been a dock that was set up there for a bonfire; they removed  
every splinter of that with their group; they even went back out there with a magnet and picked  
all of the nails up, so please believe him when he tells everyone that they are an amazing  
group; and the County appreciates them. He asked if the representative from Weekend  
Warriors would like to speak and if she is in support of this.  
Chair Steele noted she can just come up and speak, or let this go, because he thinks this is  
going in the right direction; and that is up to her.  
Sharon Noll, Weekend Warriors, expressed her appreciation to Ms. Sullivan for her words; she  
advised they are in absolute and complete support of the agreements with KBB moving  
forward; they are looking forward to a collaboration with them, however that is going to look;  
and they could not be any more in support.  
Commissioner Pritchett expressed her appreciation to Ms. Noll for all that she does.  
Commissioner Feltner seconded Commissioner Pritchett’s earlier motion.  
Commissioner Tobia stated he likes the first two provisions on here; he had one of them, but  
only on one section, so he thinks it is wise these are combined; he also thinks it is wise that  
they are run through the County for an administrative cost; his issue is with the numbers; they  
really do not add up very well; and here is where he got it. He pointed out there is an increased  
cost to the Causeways of roughly $36,000 and change; however, there the scope is expanded  
to add an additional causeway, so that justifies the better part, if not all of the initial costs. He  
remarked he has no concerns with the added expenditures for the causeway portion of that; but  
he does want to go to the other section; the County is looking at an increase of roughly  
$85,000, or 49 percent; that is to go from an expenditure of $175,000 to $260,000; they  
justified that with three things, an increase in tourism, an increase in fuel costs, and an increase  
in material costs, so the scope is not expanding; and these are the three added costs. He  
stated unfortunately, none of those even get close to justifying a 49 percent increase; he did  
look these up, because when one comes and asks for more money, he thinks it is very fair to  
have some baseline; he looked over the period of time since the last contract; using the data  
from 2022 to Fiscal Year 2024, the County has seen roughly 12 percent increase in Tourism  
Development Tax (TDT) collection; but when drilling down a little bit more, it has actually seen  
about an 11 percent increase in Cocoa Beach. He noted when getting to fuel costs, over the  
past five years according to the U.S. Department of Transportation, have gone up 35 percent;  
he does understand that 35 percent is close to 49 percent; but he was informed walking in that,  
that only counts for 10 to 15 percent of their budget; and finally, materials. He stated there is no  
justification of what those materials are; he has no problem with a 49 percent increase as long  
as the Board can justify why it is providing a 49 percent increase; he would be more than willing  
to provide a three percent per year over those five; but that does not get anywhere near that  
$85,000; in fact, it would be about $57,000 less than what is collected here; he would be willing,  
again, to vote for that 49 percent, but there is no justification; tourism is up, fuel is up, but  
neither is up 49 percent; and they have given the County any justification of what materials they  
needed. He mentioned they did the job at $175,000; he does not know why the Board needs to  
arbitrarily offer a 49 percent increase; he thinks that would be irresponsible of the Board; and  
by doing the 3 percent increase, that would be $57,126 less than what they are asking for.  
Chair Steele passed the gavel to Vice Chair Pritchett.  
Commissioner Steele commented he understands what Commissioner Tobia is saying; he  
thinks what has happened here is these good people have been working short-handed and  
using volunteers to supplement what they are doing; they have been getting underpaid to be  
able to do the work that they need to do; he is perfectly comfortable with their proposal; and he  
would absolutely, unequivocally, without any question support it. He noted he understands  
Commissioner Tobia’s option on it; and he does not have the same opinion, so hopefully, the  
Board can come to some understanding on this and move forward.  
Vice Chair Pritchett passed the gavel back to Chair Steele.  
Commissioner Pritchett asked if the gentleman from KBB can come back up if has any  
explanations of what it would cost.  
Deb Harman, Board Chair of Keep Brevard Beautiful, advised she understands Commissioner  
Tobia is concerned; she is going to explain how they arrived at these numbers; he is asking for  
a percentage increase; it is nearly impossible for them to get to a percentage increase that she  
can make sense of and defend; and Mr. Nico will tell the Board that when he showed her the  
numbers and estimate that was put together for Peter Cranis, Tourism Development Office, for  
both offices, she said based on what. She went on to say they dug in and analyzed their costs  
for the last two years, and have given a pretty detailed cost estimate for what it is costing them  
now and what they can foresee next year; just to clarify one thing, on the beach contract,  
before the Pineda entered in there and were asked to do that, and are grateful for the  
Waterway Warriors and what they are going to do together, they originally paid $60,000 in  
2019; in 2022, she believes, they were given an extension of $40,000 for that one year to take  
care of the additional trash from the people coming back to the beach during the pandemic for  
one year; they are asking for 120; and that expired at the end of the County’s Fiscal Year 2022,  
maybe 2023. She pointed out they were compensated $100,000; the trash did not go away;  
they did not cut their level of service; they have analyzed their costs and said it is going to cost  
120; if the Board looks at the number for Pineda added, they are roughly similar numbers; and  
the Causeway, if the Board remembers, the level of effort on each Causeway varies, so there is  
some variation by Causeway. She mentioned as far as the beach contact is concerned, she  
cannot defend why it was increased; she thinks the number was artificially low, and she does  
not know why, based on what was negotiated years ago; she can tell the Board what is in that  
number; and they are happy to disclose how they arrived at the $26,000 for materials, which  
includes fuel, supplies like bags, as the big bags the use at the beach are quite expensive,  
personal protective equipment, because they do have people on the causeways doing fairly  
dangerous things, and on SR 520 as part of the beach contract. She stated she can give the  
Board the breakdown, which is roughly $246,000 just for the beach, and another roughly  
$24,000 to $25,000 for the Causeway at the SR 520 Causeway; all of these contracts are  
based on the same labor rates they have now, the same general costs for their allocations for  
insurance; their vehicle insurance, every year, for all of their vehicles is roughly $53,000; she  
does not know if any of that was included originally; when she looks at the numbers now versus  
then, it is very hard to get to that; but she can tell the Board that they are happy to sit and  
disclose; they went over these numbers, and the backup with their treasurer who has been their  
treasurer for 30 years, just this morning; and she cannot speak to the increase because she  
was not here when the original number was created. She expressed her appreciation to Chair  
Steele for pointing out that on top of what they get paid for, they bring a lot of volunteer activity;  
they have not stopped even though their funding has not been adequate for the last couple of  
years; they are just asking moving forward to be paid for the value they are giving for the paid  
work; and they will continue to work hard to supplement that. She noted she is from the  
business world where they competed for government contracts at all levels; she understands  
the Board has a fiscal responsibility, she has a fiscal responsibility as a citizen, she wants to  
see the County use the funds well; but she also has an obligation for stewardship to make sure  
their organization is sustainable because of the work they do.  
Commissioner Tobia pointed out that Ms. Harman said she could not defend the increase; he  
asked if someone came to her, a contractor, they were asking her for maybe a 50 percent  
increase, and she asked why they are asking for a 50 percent increase, and they said they  
cannot defend the increase; and he asked if she would provide them with that increase.  
Ms. Harman explained she wants to say it a different way, all she can do is to explain the costs  
that they have today and how it compares to what they have been paid for the last two years.  
Commissioner Tobia remarked she just said the treasurer was there for 30 years, did she not.  
Ms. Harman replied that is true.  
Commissioner Tobia stated he is listening to her, it is just not adding up.  
Ms. Harman went on to explain that is true, and he cannot explain it for her either.  
Commissioner Tobia asked if her treasurer cannot answer it who has been there 30 years, and  
she cannot, why she expects this Board to arbitrarily hand her 49 percent more; again, she  
cannot explain it, the treasurer cannot explain it, but she expects the Board to hand over 49  
percent more.  
Ms. Harman stated all she knows is in 2019 it was a grant and was not intended to cover their  
full costs; she reiterated she does not know; they are willing to let the Board review them in  
detail; and the County can let their financial people tell them whether or not there are things  
that are not allowable.  
Commissioner Tobia expressed his appreciation to Ms. Harman for being honest.  
Commissioner Feltner asked he knows this went to the Tourist Development Council (TDC),  
and if in the aggregate there were any concerns over the cost at that time of the two contracts.  
Mr. Cranis replied there were questions that the TDC asked, but they felt, he thinks satisfied  
after getting the answers; and it was a unanimous vote.  
Commissioner Pritchett mentioned this is kind of in Commissioner Goodson’s area; and she  
would not mind if he would kind of chime in with his thoughts.  
Commissioner Goodson commented there are two options; it can be tabled and brought back  
with everything that Commissioner Tobia wants to look at, or the Board can vote today,  
because he is in agreement, they do a wonderful job; the TDC said everyone voted  
unanimously for it; and he is onboard with them.  
The Board approved and authorized the Tourism Development Office Director to sign a  
three-year Contract with a two-year extension with KBB beginning October 1, 2024, for  
clean-up on SR 406 Max Brewer Causeway, SR 528 Beachline Causeway, SR 518 Eau Gallie  
Causeway, Highway 192 Melbourne Causeway, SR 404 Pineda Causeway, SR 520 Causeway,  
and beach clean-up, totaling $417,184 per year, subject to County Attorney, Risk Management,  
and Purchasing Services approval; authorized funds for SR 520 Causeway and clean-up to  
come from the Tourism Beach Fund under Section 102-119(3)b and (4) a of the Code;  
authorized the funds for the other five (5) causeway projects to come from the Lagoon portion  
of the Beach Fund under Section 102-119(4)a of the Code; adopted the legislative findings as  
set forth in the requested action listed on the Agenda Reports for Items J.1. and J.2.; and  
authorized the County Manager to execute any necessary Budget Change Requests (BCR).  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Rita Pritchett  
Seconder: Rob Feltner  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Feltner, and Steele  
Nay: Tobia  
J.2. Approval, Re: Contract with City of Cocoa Beach for Keep Brevard Beautiful  
Beach and SR520 Causeway Clean-up  
The Board approved and authorized the Tourism Development Office Director to sign a  
three-year Contract with a two-year extension with KBB beginning October 1, 2024, for  
clean-up on SR 406 Max Brewer Causeway, SR 528 Beachline Causeway, SR 518 Eau Gallie  
Causeway, Highway 192 Melbourne Causeway, SR 404 Pineda Causeway, SR 520 Causeway,  
and beach clean-up, totaling $417,184 per year, subject to County Attorney, Risk Management,  
and Purchasing Services approval; authorized funds for SR 520 Causeway and clean-up to  
come from the Tourism Beach Fund under Section 102-119(3)b and (4) a of the Code;  
authorized the funds for the other five (5) causeway projects to come from the Lagoon portion  
of the Beach Fund under Section 102-119(4)a of the Code; adopted the legislative findings as  
set forth in the requested action listed on the Agenda Reports for Items J.1. and J.2.; and  
authorized the County Manager to execute any necessary Budget Change Requests (BCR).  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Rita Pritchett  
Seconder: Rob Feltner  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Feltner, and Steele  
Nay: Tobia  
J.3. Proposed Amendment to the Brevard County Home Rule Charter to Align the  
School Board Member Residence Areas with the County Commission Districts  
Commissioner Tobia stated he wants to go over a little bit of the history that is going on here;  
on May 23rd, the School Board voluntarily voted to align their district boundaries with the  
Commission districts so that they share the same boundaries as the Commission; this was one  
of the things that he wanted to do when he got elected; he thought that there were five County  
Commission districts and five School Board districts; and it should make sense that they were  
aligned accordingly. He went on to say it lowers costs to taxpayers, it reduces confusion to  
voters, and it eliminates redundancies; following this vote by the School board, he suggested at  
the July 11, 2023, meeting that the Board looks into potentially a Charter amendment to ensure  
that the two entities/districts continue to align in the future; he asked why to do this; he stated  
dictating the boundaries remain cohesive will save reoccurring estimated of approximately  
$30,500 every 10 years, so $17,000 in legal fees, and $1,300 in Geographical Information  
Systems (GIS) licensing will also save an estimated 250 hours in County staff time alone; and  
the School Board its own costs. He remarked the next time redistricting comes around, the  
County and the School Board would have an equal amount of appointees on the new  
redistricting committee; to get this on the 2024 ballot, the language must be submitted to the  
Supervisor of Elections by August 19, 2024; seeing that this is a Charter amendment, there  
would be a supermajority, so it would obviously need four of the Commissioners; it also  
requires review by a three-attorney panel to ensure it embraces only one subject and is  
consistent with the Florida Constitution, general law, and the Charter; the attached resolution  
includes a clause that the language would not be submitted to the Supervisor of Elections  
unless and until it is approved by at least two members of said panel; if the panel is not able to  
complete the review, the amendment, in time for the 2024 deadline, would be submitted in the  
2026 ballot measure; and this is important, this does not take away authority from the School  
Board. He went on to say when the five County Commission districts are redrawn, the five  
School Board Members areas would also be withdrawn in conjunction; however, the proposed  
Charter amendment provides for the following redistricting the School Board will still retain the  
authority, under Florida Statute 1001.32, Section 2; they may make any changes that it deem  
necessary should they not see fit, so in other words, what this would do is make the default of  
the Board and School Board working together; if the School Board did not like that, they would  
have the ability to override; but it makes no sense that the Board invests time and money  
drawing lines; and the School Board does the same thing under the same parameters. He  
noted this would potentially put this on the ballot in 2024; if the Board cannot meet the deadline,  
put it on the 2026; he is open to answer any questions on positives or negatives suggestions,  
any of that good stuff; he is very happy that the School Board voluntarily joined the Board, so if  
one is in County Commission District 2, he or she is also in School Board District 2, so he just  
wanted to make that a default and not necessarily goodwill like it happened this last time; and  
that is what he is looking for. He stated he wanted to make a motion to adopt a resolution  
proposing an amendment to the Brevard County Home Rule Charter to align School Board  
Member residence areas with the County Commission Districts; to authorize staff to submit the  
proposed Charter Amendment and ballot language to the three-attorney panel with review  
proposed Charter amendments for compliance with the Florida Constitution, Florida law, and  
the Brevard County Charter, and to determine whether proposed amendment embraces only  
one subject; and if at least two members of the panel approve the proposal amendment,  
provide for a placement of the proposed amendment at the referendum held concurrently with  
the November 5, 2024, general election; if the deadline should pass before the panel is able to  
successfully complete its review, the amendment will be placed on the 2026 ballot.  
Commissioner Pritchett stated she would second the motion.  
Commissioner Goodson asked if Commissioner Tobia can tell him with the three panels  
reviewing it, what the cost would be to the County.  
Commissioner Tobia replied there is an hourly cost; and he stated he would like to punt that  
over to the County Attorney.  
Morris Richardson, County Attorney, explained he thinks there is a one-time estimated cost of  
$15,000 for the three-attorney panel review.  
Commissioner Goodson inquired if this is such a great idea, why would the Board not get with  
the School Board to share in the cost.  
Commissioner Tobia responded out of good will of the School Board aligned with the Board, so  
that is $7,500; he thinks that is fair; the big savings here is the $30,000 every 10 years; the  
mapping software that the County buys, or licensed not buy, and the School Board license, can  
now be combined; the legal notices can now be combined if the Board should go this way; and  
most importantly, again, 250 hours of staff time could be split there, so he would like for the  
School Board to pony up $7,500, but he certainly does not want this to go down for the split of  
that.  
Commissioner Feltner asked if this would not happen until 2031, the next redistricting; he  
stated with all due respect, he thinks the Board could decide in early 2028 whether it wants to  
take this issue up and put it before the voters that cycle; and if the voters agree to that, that  
would still be in place by 2031, so he would let a future Board do this.  
Chair Steele called for a vote on the motion.  
The Board denied the proposed amendment to the Brevard County Home Rule Charter to align  
the School Board member residence areas with the County Commission Districts.  
Result: DENIED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
Ayes: Pritchett, and Tobia  
Nay: Goodson, Feltner, and Steele  
Chair Steele pointed out candidly it is a great idea, the timing is just off he thinks is what the  
problem is; and ultimately, the County will get there sooner or later.  
J.4. Letter to Palm Bay re: Low-income Senior Citizen Additional Homestead Tax  
Exemption  
Commissioner Tobia expressed his appreciation to one of his constituents who brought this to  
his attention; he mentioned he went to his campaign Post Office box; he had sent a snail mail  
letter bringing that to his attention; and he thought this was very interesting. He continued by  
saying Brevard County enacted an exemption in 2007 after 75.31 percent of Brevard County  
voters approved an amendment to the State Constitution; this additional homestead tax  
exemption for low income seniors is authorized by Section 6(d) of Article VII, of the Florida  
Constitution; what it does is if one owns his or her permanent residency as of January 1, they  
are approved for the additional $25,000 homestead exemption for citizens 65 years of age; all  
persons living at the household to file Federal returns, must provide a copy of their prior year  
Federal Income Tax return for verification; the low-income threshold for qualifying is calculated  
annually by the Department of Revenue; and to put it in perspective, in 2004, that is merely  
$36,614. He stated the County offers this, and 11 of the 16 municipalities also offer this  
homestead exemption for low-income seniors; there are five who do not; he is picking on the  
City of Palm Bay, because he represents a large portion of Palm Bay; the constituent that  
brought it to his attention is from Palm Bay; and most importantly, the City of Palm Bay has an  
almost 7 percent tax increase that they will be budgeting. He noted the good news to that is  
they were also talking about a two mill that came outside of that, so for taxpayers in Palm Bay,  
it could be worse; the other ones, by the way, are Rockledge, Melbourne, which is talking about  
a 6 percent tax increase, and Indialantic, which is talking about a 7.23 percent increase; again,  
the Mayor of the City of Palm Bay claims very conservative; by looking at the approved tax  
increases of the last years, it would be seen that 24/25 was 2.6 percent, 23/24 was 2.9 percent,  
22/23 was 15.3 percent, and 21/22 was a 2.5 percent tax increase; to be very clear, they play  
games over there; but games cannot be played with the Department of Revenue as defined by  
a tax increase. He pointed out the Department of Revenue clearly says if it is above the  
rollback it is a tax increase; Palm Bay had to put in a half-page ad in the Florida TODAY, it may  
be a quarter-page ad, advertising their tax increases; first of all he would like to thank the City  
of Palm Bay that reached out ahead of time, which was very kind; on July 24th Governor  
DeSantis said at press conference, “Why are you trying to raise property taxes in the middle of  
some of the worst inflation we have ever seen. Why don’t you manage things better instead of  
trying to come and jack up people’s taxes;” he stated he thinks that is pretty darned clear, so all  
he is asking here is he has attached a letter which he would like the Board to co-sign asking  
the City of Palm Bay to offer the exact same exemption to low-income seniors; and not that,  
that will counter the tax increase that they are trying to levy on the rest of their citizens, but he  
thinks it would carry more weight with this Board. He stated the letter is attached, he tried to  
make it pretty nice; should this Board go in a different direction, the letter that will come out of  
his office, with an appropriate disclaimer on it, will be nowhere near as nice; the Board talks  
about low-income housing, here is an opportunity that the County already takes advantage of  
that Palm Bay does not; he would just like the letter to go out; he fully-supports any other Board  
Member sending a similar letter to the other cities that do not participate; again, the snail mail  
letter he received from a constituent who will go nameless brought that to his attention; he  
really appreciates the Board taking the time and the effort to do that; and here is his attempt to  
help get it fixed; he wishes it could be done unilaterally up here; but the Commissioners can  
certainly provide some pressure to Palm Bay to do the right thing; and that is his request.  
Commissioner Feltner stated just to clarify, the $50,000 is off the value on the municipal taxes;  
it is not any other item on a TRIM notice or tax bill; and he asked if that is correct.  
Commissioner Tobia replied his understanding is municipal, correct.  
Commissioner Tobia made the motion for the Board to approve and authorize the Chair to sign  
the Letter to the City of Palm Bay for low-income senior citizen additional Homestead Tax  
Exemption.  
Commissioner Feltner advised he will second the motion.  
Commissioner Pritchett asked Commissioner Tobia to read the letter, as she does not have it in  
front of her; elderly people right now are trying to make ends meet; Commissioner Tobia has a  
good handle on that; and she hopes the cities will kind of have an ear to that a bit, because  
people are really having a hard time right now making the bills.  
Commissioner Tobia read the letter aloud.  
Commissioner Pritchett remarked she likes it; and she thinks Commissioner Tobia might get a  
little bit more attention if he takes off Governor DeSantis’ comments, if he would consider that  
Commissioner Tobia advised he does not mind getting rid of that.  
Commissioner Pritchett pointed out it will be a little softer.  
Chair Steele called for a vote on the motion.  
The Board approved and authorized the Chair to sign the Letter to the City of Palm Bay for  
low-income senior citizen additional Homestead Tax Exemption.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: John Tobia  
Seconder: Rob Feltner  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele  
J.5. Approval for Partial Funding of Phase 2 Study for Port St. John Regional  
Wastewater Treatment Plant.  
Frank Abbate, County Manager, stated staff put this on the Agenda this afternoon; they had  
spoken to the Federal Government representative who is responsible for these grants; they  
were told the County is in good shape for the grant, but the County needed to get this taken  
care of because the funding for this particular grant they have to spend the dollars that are  
available by October 1; the upper echelon felt that what the Board sees in here would be  
necessary for them to provide that approval; and this is provide a $700,000 grant for funding of  
a study that is going to help the County with the Military Installation Resilience (MIR) grant  
which is a combination of the Department of Defense grant that helps the County with  
installation in Port St. John to bring over water/wastewater from beachside over onto the  
mainland. He went on to say it helps with the affordable housing resiliency in the river, and a  
variety of other avenues; it is definitely something the County needs to do in that area anyway;  
and staff is looking for Board approval.  
Chair Steele commented he sees Ms. Sullivan waiving her card; and he did not forget she had  
a card in.  
Sandra Sullivan stated she would not want to speak out and say the Chair forgot her card, and  
be escorted out by the deputies again.  
Chair Steele noted it can be arranged if Ms. Sullivan wants.  
Ms. Sullivan explained at the last meeting, Port St. John was being discussed; she showed the  
Board a document, and pointed out a red line being capacity; she stated this is 2024 right here;  
the County is almost double what the capacity of the plant is according to this; and it is crazy.  
She went on by saying also in that report, this is the Federal lands in North Merritt Island; the  
County is developing that for wastewater; she talked earlier today about the hydrology study;  
she provided a copy to the Board of the 10-year flooding; she noted it is kind of interesting  
when the County spends one-half a million dollars for a study, and not include the Space  
Florida portion; it is missing from the study; this is very much a floodplain and it floods all of the  
time; and the flooding in North Merritt Island has filled this room more than any other topic,  
citizen driven. She stated this number was not brought up, but this is a 1.717 million to be  
funded from Utility Services, so what is being talked about is the development of the Space  
Florida leased lands as being constrained, because their sewage is going to Space Force on  
the base; that is near capacity; she wrote North Brevard Economic Development Zone  
(NBEDZ), and they said they wanted a letter from NBEDZ saying it would support putting in a  
temporary line to Sykes Creek Sewage Plant; but this is about development; it also talks about  
affordable housing, so the Senate Bill 102 in 2024 is to put, allows, affordable housing on those  
Federal-owned lands; and the problem with that is, there is no property taxes paid for that, so  
the County is literally putting the cost of all of this infrastructure on the people for business;  
then the Commissioners come here the last meeting with the Economic Development  
Commission (EDC) and wanting to put tax abatements for the companies going on there; she  
cannot comprehend this that the County, first of all, is being irresponsible with Port St. John  
being over capacity; then the County is looking for the people to pay $1.71 million for  
something that should be paid by the State and the Federal Government, because this is  
something for them; and this is another classic example of ‘we the money’ versus ‘we the  
people’, and burdening the people for the money interests.  
Commissioner Pritchett pointed out this is an enterprise fund, so it works like a business; the  
money the County invests, which it has to do as it is over capacity; it is the business of the  
Enterprise Fund will eventually pay back all of these funds down-the-road, and do a great job in  
helping the citizens with growth; and she just wanted to mention that.  
The Board approved partial funding of the Phase 2 Study for a proposed Port St. John  
Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant in the amount of $1.717 million from the Utility Services  
Fund; authorized the County to pursue the Phase 2 Study either in cooperation with the EDC  
as a sub-grant recipient, or as the primary MIR grant recipient; authorized the County Manager  
to execute any grant agreement(s) and amendment(s), upon County Attorney, Risk  
Management, and Central Services review; and authorized the County Manager to execute and  
submit required Budget Change Request (BCR), amend the five-year Capital Improvements  
Plan (CIP) as it relates to this project, and any documents, reimbursement requests,  
amendments, or other administrative actions necessary to leverage the MIR grant funding.  
Result: APPROVED AS AMENDED  
Mover: Rita Pritchett  
Seconder: John Tobia  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele  
K.  
PUBLIC COMMENTS  
public comment sections.)  
Sandra Sullivan stated she wants to talk about F.6., Permission to Advertise for Repeal of  
Ordinance 89-29 – State Road 46 Water Extension #1; it is a done deal; but she is going to  
speak about it anyway; she looked up on the St. Johns River Water Management District  
(SJRWMD) site . . .  
Chair Steele advised he is completely lost on what Ms. Sullivan is talking about.  
Ms. Sullivan commented she just wanted to talk about something she forgot to put in a card for,  
if that is okay; if the Commissioners want to object to that, she will just stop talking about it.  
Morris Richardson, County Attorney, advised it is up to the Chair; the Policy provides that the  
Consent Agenda is for discussing business items of the County that are not on the Agenda;  
and one is just supposed to discuss items that are otherwise.  
Chair Steele advised Ms. Sullivan to go on.  
Ms. Sullivan stated this was for putting in a waterline; this was a funding source essentially as  
hook-ups by developers, they would pay a connection fee; that was revised a couple of times  
with some Ordinance Agreements; now, the Board is saying, okay, the line is put in and it is all  
done; and she is pretty confused about this. She went on to say she looked up on SJRWMD’s  
site, and the Conditional Use Permit (CUP), there is no waterline in the CUP, so it seems to be  
a misrepresentation in the item; but this has been handled and the waterline is there; and  
according to SJRWMD’s site, it is not there. She pointed out she has been coming to these  
meetings for almost six years; honestly, it gets frustrating coming here; she reiterated what she  
has said before that she has never seen a Commission like this particular Commission when it  
comes to not respecting the will of the people, seemingly not having the interest of the people  
in mind, and always being ‘we the money’; and that is her perception on so many items.  
L.6. Rob Feltner, Commissioner District 4  
Commissioner Feltner stated when the Board were discussing the Keep Brevard Beautiful  
(KBB) contract, he wanted to recognize Julie Braga who is on the Tourist Development Council  
(TDC); and he thinks she brought up Pineda and was a voice for that, so he is glad Pineda is  
included in there, and that Ms. Braga made a case for it.  
L.7. Jason Steele, Commissioner District 5, Chair  
Chair Steele stated he was in Washington, D.C., and they had tremendous meetings; he thinks  
they had some success; the decision on the Brightline fund will be coming in October; he does  
not know what it is going to be yet; but he has a passed this booklet around on who they met  
with, where they met, and all of the other thinks; and he is hoping and praying that good results  
are gotten.  
Commissioner District 1 Rita Pritchett, Commissioner District 2  
Tom Goodson, Commissioner District 3 John Tobia,  
Commissioner District 4 Rob Feltner, and Commissioner District 5  
Jason Steele  
Present:  
L.5. John Tobia, Commissioner District 3  
Commissioner Tobia commented today is National Root Beer Float Day; the useful Florida fact  
is Telestar One launched on July 10, 1962, from Cape Canaveral, the world’s first active  
communications satellite; AT&T uses satellites to test basic features of communications via  
space; this day in Florida history is on this day in 1763, Augustine Prèvost arrived in Florida and  
was appointed as the interim Military Governor of West Florida after the seven-year war ended;  
and Prèvost was appointed to the West Indies where he served as Deputy Inspector General in  
Kingston, Jamaica. He stated the employee recognition is for Morgan Roth, Program Assistant,  
Family and Consumer Sciences, in the UF Extension Services Department; she has been there  
three years; the Director wrote, “I am glad to write this recommendation for Morgan Roth who’s  
been an outstanding member of the University of Florida IFUS Brevard County team for the  
past three years. Morgan has demonstrated exceptional skills, dedication, and professionalism  
in her role, making her an invaluable asset to our organization. From the moment Morgan  
joined our team, she worked to strengthen our marketing efforts. Her expertise in the area was  
immediately evident, and we were thrilled to have her capabilities and knowledge on our team.  
She took the initiative to work collaboratively with all program areas providing assistance  
wherever needed. Morgan’s efforts were instrumental in establishing protocols that gave our  
office a professional look across all programming areas. Morgan’s impact, particularly notable  
in her work with Farmer’s Market at Wickham Park. She worked to attract more vendors,  
clientele, especially after disruptions caused by COVID-19. In addition to marketing  
responsibilities, Morgan also serves as the Farmer’s Market Manager, overseeing day-to-day  
operations and managing the double buck’s supplement nutritional assistance program dollar  
grant. This grant ensures that consumers on SNAP can purchase fresh fruit and vegetables,  
effectively increasing their buying power and promoting healthier eating habits. Over the last  
years, Morgan spearheaded two additional marketing campaigns aimed at attracting more  
consumers to the market. Her creativity and strategic thinking have significantly contributed to  
the market’s growth and success. Morgan’s commitment to professional development is evident  
through her participation in the Lean Six Sigma Program. During this program she worked on a  
library project to streamline the process of adding books to shelves, while showcasing her  
ability to excel beyond her primary responsibilities. Her success in the project highlighted her  
versatility and problem solving skills, further providing for value to our organization. In  
conclusion, Morgan Roth is a remarkable employee who consistently exceeds expectations.  
Her contributions to our team and community have been substantial, and her positive attitude  
and willingness to take on new challenges are truly commendable. We are proud to present  
Morgan Roth as a worthy employee of Brevard County and hardily recommend her in any  
future endeavors.” He noted it almost sounds like they are trying to get rid of Ms. Roth, saying  
she is great in other places; he expressed his appreciation to Ms. Roth and all she does for  
Brevard County.  
Upon motion and vote, the meeting adjourned at 6:36 p.m.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Rob Feltner  
Seconder: Rita Pritchett  
Ayes: Pritchett, Goodson, Tobia, Feltner, and Steele