Brevard County Board of County Commissioners  
Commission Chambers, Building C  
2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way  
Viera, FL 32940  
Minutes  
Tuesday, April 21, 2026  
9:00 AM  
Regular  
Commission Chambers  
C.  
CALL TO ORDER  
Rollcall  
Commissioner District 1 Katie Delaney , Commissioner District 2  
Tom Goodson, Commissioner District 3 Kim Adkinson,  
Commissioner District 4 Rob Feltner, and Commissioner District 5  
Thad Altman  
Present:  
B.  
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Commissioner Kim Adkinson, District 3, Vice-Chair  
Commissioner Adkinson led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance.  
The Board approved Commissioner Goodson to appear telephonically.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Katie Delaney  
Ayes: Delaney, Goodson, Adkinson, Feltner, and Altman  
E.1. Resolution recognizing May 2026 as Citizen Engagement Month - District 1  
Commissioner Delaney stated she brought this Resolution forward to recognize something that  
sits at the core of effective local government, an engaged and informed citizenry; this resolution  
affirms Brevard County’s commitment to citizen participation from Speak Up Brevard to  
Advisory Boards, Public Comment, and programs like the Citizen’s Academy; it also reflects the  
Board’s responsibility to consider citizen recommendations each month during Speak Up  
Brevard and highlight the role of Florida Sunshine Law in ensuring transparency and access;  
together these efforts reinforce that informed and active participation that strengthens  
accountability, improves decision making, and builds public trust; and to celebrate this month,  
she has invited District 1 resident, Toni Shiffalo, who speaks frequently at the Titusville City  
Council Meetings, to share a few words after she reads the resolution.  
Commissioner Delaney read aloud, and the Board adopted Resolution No. 26-032, recognizing  
May 2026 as Citizen Engagement Month.  
Result: ADOPTED  
Mover: Katie Delaney  
Seconder: Rob Feltner  
Ayes: Delaney, Goodson, Adkinson, Feltner, and Altman  
Toni Shiffalo stated some 50 years ago her parents owned what is now 200 feet inside the  
National Aeronautical and Space Administration (NASA) line on Playalinda Beach; 50 years  
later she has returned to Titusville looking for a home on the east side of Orlando, where she  
grew up; she wound up here because once one crosses the St. Johns River, here one is in the  
beautiful area; unbeknownst to her, she bought what is one of the 12 locally designated historic  
structures of Titusville, due to the Titusville Historic Preservation Board; “what does that mean”  
she asked at her closing when the real estate agent said she would be getting a plaque, and  
the agent told her she had just bought a historic structure; to find out what that meant to her,  
she got herself involved with the Titusville Historic Preservation Board, and was eventually  
appointed because she started going to the Titusville City Council meetings; she found out that  
she only went to council meetings when there was some activity that pertained to her  
neighborhood; and low and behold, on just about every agenda there was some item to her  
neighborhood. She went on to say not knowing exactly how to answer questions of her  
neighbors when they would complain about the potholes on I-95, and what the City is doing  
about it, she advised it is not the City, then they would question what the County is doing about  
it; in order to protect the County she started finding out who is in charge of what; then  
something came along like this Citizen’s Academy which she attended and learned a lot of  
things; citizen involvement is very important; this is how the Board finds out about what its  
constituents are talking about, what they are thinking about, what they are needing, and what  
they are wanting the Board to do for them; she asked where do citizens find out about that as  
there is no newspaper to read any longer, if one remembers the days when people got up and  
read the newspaper with their morning coffee; to find out what is going on, it takes a certain  
amount of integrity, information, digging, and consistency to find out, except there are ways  
that Brevard County is making it easy for the citizens; they can participate fully by giving the  
Board feedback as well as pushback, but it has to be informed and educated participation; that  
is where things like the Citizen’s Academy come in; and also they have a citizen’s engagement  
month every year to remind the citizens that there are ways to get educated, know what is  
going on, and to give proper feedback and pushback to those whom they have elected to  
represent their communities. She commented she wants to commend the County for the efforts  
to engage citizens through the Citizen Efficiency and Effectiveness Recommendations (CEER)  
Program and the Citizen’s Academy, and she hopes it looks for other ways such as townhall  
meetings in each District, so that citizens can come and speak with the Board directly and not  
just at formal meetings; she expressed her appreciation for the Resolution; and she stated the  
citizens of Brevard, especially those in District 1 that she is representing today, really  
appreciate the Board’s efforts.  
E.2. Resolution for A Day of Prayer in Brevard County on May 7, 2026 - District 1  
Commissioner Delaney stated she is bringing this forward to recognize May 7 as a day of  
Prayer in Brevard County in conjunction with the National Day of Prayer; and Ms. Loretta  
Dozier is here as the citizen requester.  
Commissioner Delaney read aloud, and the Board adopted Resolution No. 26-033, recognizing  
May 7, as A Day in Prayer in Brevard County.  
Result: ADOPTED  
Mover: Katie Delaney  
Seconder: Kim Adkinson  
Ayes: Delaney, Goodson, Adkinson, Feltner, and Altman  
Loretta Dozier expressed her appreciation to the Board for the Resolution; she stated first to  
thank God for allowing her to be there and stand before this Board; she thanked the Board as  
every year she comes to the Commissioners and ask them to present the resolutions and they  
have done that for the last 10 years; she introduce herself as the Brevard County coordinator  
for the National Day of Prayer Task Force; she brought with her some of the volunteers that are  
city or town coordinators and she would like them to introduce themselves because she wants  
the Board to know who their constituents are; they will say their name and the city where they  
are from; but the goal, the mission of the National Day of Prayer Task Force is to mobilize and  
multiply, unified public prayer for America. She went on to say on May 7, thousands of people  
around the country will be praying for seven different areas; in the brochure the seven different  
areas are there, the people will be praying for the church, family, education, business, military,  
government, art, media, and entertainment; of course they are praying for their cities and their  
city leaders; these people are so grateful that this country is a free country and people can pray  
and give God glory for that because the theme is Glorify God; and she reiterated her  
appreciation to the Board for the Resolution.  
Pastor Evie stated looking at the document, there are 70 sites and growing; this is a working  
document; people are still calling in advising they will be another site for prayer; this shows the  
cities throughout Brevard County that have stepped forward to pray at government facilities, at  
parks, at schools, at the flagpoles, on media outlets, and some are virtual meetings where  
there are telephone prayer lines and conference lines; there are different languages of Creole,  
English, Spanish, Chinese, and bilingual; there is on at Carter’s Garage for some men at 6:00  
a.m.; there are businesses; and they are just very excited about so many participants across  
the spectrum throughout Brevard County. She went on to say, she did not mention churches,  
but there are lots of churches involved; she is very pleased at how people have come out and  
feel this is very important; when this day is over, she wants the Board to know they still pray for  
him or her every day and that the Board is very important to them; they thank God for how he  
has blessed this County, the State of Florida; one can see God’s blessing if one goes to the  
National Day of Prayer website, it will look like red dots over everywhere that a prayer site has  
gone up; and when one sees the State of Florida by May 7, Florida will be covered in red,  
except for the Everglades; it is a wonderful thing; and may the Lord bless the Commissioners  
richly.  
Ms. Dozier had those with her introduce themselves; she stated they want to leave with a  
prayer; Kathy Brenzel is the president of the National Day of Prayer Task Force and at every  
observance those 70-plus observances, a prayer for America will be read in unison; and they  
prayed.  
E.3. Resolution to recognize the Brevard County Citizens Academy - District 1  
Commissioner Delaney stated she sponsored this Item because it is one of the County’s  
programs that has been around for a long time; it provides real value to the community, but is  
still not widely known by all of the residents; it is a valuable resource that she hopes many of  
the residents take advantage of for upcoming cycles; the Brevard County Citizen’s Academy  
has been offered since 2001, as a way for residents to learn how their County government  
works, what services are provided, how departments operate, and how decisions move through  
the process; it is a seven-week program held each February and March in partnership with the  
UF/IFAS Extension Office; the most recent class concluded March 26, and for anyone  
interested, this year’s presentations are available online as backup for this Agenda Item; and  
before she reads the resolution she wants to briefly outline the speakers. She went on to say  
after she will invite UF/IFAS Extension Director, Beth Shephard, to say a few words, followed  
by inviting one of the County staff who participated in the Program; and then she would like to  
see if one of this year’s Citizen Academy graduates would say a few words. She commented  
she would like to take a moment to recognize the many staff members who contributed to this  
program; she asked any staff that has ever given a presentation at Citizen’s Academy to please  
stand; and she stated their willingness to share their time and expertise is what makes the  
academy such a valuable experience.  
Commissioner Delaney read aloud, and the Board adopted Resolution No. 26-034, recognizing  
the Brevard County Citizen’s Academy.  
Result: ADOPTED  
Mover: Katie Delaney  
Seconder: Rob Feltner  
Ayes: Delaney, Goodson, Adkinson, Feltner, and Altman  
Ms. Shephard expressed her appreciation for the Resolution; she stated those of the UF/IFAS  
Extension are truly honored to accept this recognition; hearing the Resolution, what stands out  
most is not just that Citizens Academy has been around since 2001, but how meaningful that  
work continues to be today; people gain an understanding of how County Government works,  
how to access services, and how decisions are made; but just as importantly, they build skills to  
engage communication, active listening and collaboration, becoming tools that they can  
actually use; and it is truly an honor to be part of a program that continues to strengthen  
Brevard County, not just through information, but through people.  
Commissioner Delaney asked John Scott, Emergency Management Director, to say a few  
words; she mentioned she has heard some really great things about his presentation that he  
just gave; and she asked that he just share some insight into what he does.  
Mr. Scott stated talking to the public is a big part of what his staff does; any time there is an  
opportunity to talk to residents who are taking that big step to become engaged, it matters to  
them because that is someone who is going to take his message back and spread it amongst  
their family, friends, and neighbors; that is a large part of how staff continued to move forward  
in this County; and they very much relish the opportunity to speak with folks.  
Toni Shiffalo stated she had a speech prepared but she is not going to waste the Board’s time  
because everybody says what the Academy does, how it unites the citizens with the  
department heads and often staff members they bring along; having been a two-time graduate,  
she got some really neat handouts from the departments to take home that have contact  
information; Morris Richardson, County Attorney, brought to their attention that this is a Charter  
County and provided copies of the Charter; attendees get fun things, from Mosquito Control,  
they did not only learn about the mosquitoes, they get a coloring book and crayons; it is a  
tremendous program; she would recommend that not only that all the citizens of Brevard  
County take the academy, but have of each session she has been in about half the participants  
were County staff members who come and learn not only what they are supposed to be doing,  
how they are reported to be doing, but how their unit fits in with the other Departments; and she  
thinks connecting the dots is a very important aspect of the Citizens Academy. She mentioned  
she wanted to congratulate Brevard County, the Board, and the Citizens for the Citizen’s  
Academy.  
E.4. Check Presentation from the Coastal Conservation Association (CCA) for $50,000  
to Brevard County for the Historic Banana River Bomb Target Artificial Reef for  
Enhanced Fish Habitat project. - District 5  
Chair Altman stated this Item is a check presentation from the Coastal Conservation  
Association (CCA) for $50,000 to Brevard County for the historic Banana River Bomb Target  
Artificial Reef for enhanced fish habitat; there is a check that will be given to the Board;  
hopefully an explanation of what the bomb target it, because it is a real nice description in the  
Agenda packet; and it is a very fascinating little piece of Brevard County history.  
A representative of CCA stated they are excited to begin this habitat restoration project where  
they are going to construct and install 40 artificial reef structures around a historic US Air Force  
Bomb target in the Banana River Lagoon; this was used as a target practice training for World  
War II; they aim to not only enhance and restore this critical habitat, but also bring awareness  
to this unique historic site; in addition, they are going to install improved signage around the  
submerged structure to enhance boater safety in the area; and the County is grateful for this  
contribution from the CCA, as well as support from the Indian River Lagoon National Estuary  
Program, the City of Cape Canaveral, and the Brevard Zoo for this project. She added without  
partnerships like this, projects like this would not be possible.  
Frank Gidus stated he is the Director of Habitat and Environmental Restoration with CCA  
Florida; this $50,000 is part of their two-year, million dollar habitat pledge that they are doing  
around the State of Florida; this project really caught their eye because, he does not know if the  
Board is aware or not, but over the last few years, it has been really difficult to find qualified  
off-shore marine contractors; this is a unique project being inshore; they have been donating to  
the Brevard County offshore artificial reef program for over a decade; they really enjoy working  
with Brevard County, it is just a seamless process; and like he said, this is not only an artificial  
reef, but a fish enhancement project. He mentioned it is going to attract fish; he has been out  
there and there is already a structure in place; it is sticking up so it is going to be really unique  
to turn this into an actual living breathing artificial reef; and he thanks the Board for the  
partnership.  
Chair Altman stated that is fantastic and he thinks the Board will do a quick photo opportunity  
with the check; he is going to invite the entire Commission down to receive the $50,000 check;  
that is just wonderful; and maybe they will photo shop Commissioner Goodson in to the photo  
since it is in his District.  
F.1. Final Plat and Contract Approval, Re: Parrish Landing  
Developer: S3 Parrish, LLC District 1  
The Board, in accordance with Section 62-2841(i) and Section 62-2844, approved and  
authorized the Chair to sign the final plat and Contract for Parrish Landing – Developer: S3  
Parrish, LLC, subject to minor engineering changes, as applicable, and developer responsible  
for obtaining all other necessary jurisdictional permits.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Katie Delaney  
F.3. Approval, Re: East Coast Zoological Society Bowen Aquarium Groundbreaking  
Deadline Extension  
The Board approved an extension of the construction groundbreaking deadline of the East  
Coast Zoological Society Aquarium (aka The Bowen Aquarium) to six (6) months after the U.S.  
Army Corps of Engineers release Easement Tract 100E-6 to the Canaveral Port Authority;  
further, based on the facts specified for each grant, by approving this Agenda Item, the Board  
will make the legislative finding that Tourist Development Tax funds are authorized for capital  
grants pursuant to Section 125.0104(5)(a)3, Florida Statutes, and Section 102-119(3)a, (5)a,  
and 6(a) of the Brevard County Code of Ordinances, as the tourist-oriented capital grant has as  
one of its main purposes the attraction of tourists, and the entity and the Space Coast Office of  
Tourism both intend to ensure marketing and promotion of this facility to tourists; authorized the  
Tourism Development Director to negotiate and sign all necessary agreements, addendums,  
and related documents upon County Attorney’s Office, Risk Management, and Central Services  
approval; and authorized the County Manager to execute necessary budget change requests.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Katie Delaney  
F.6. Authorization, Re: Central Florida Crimeline Serving Brevard County  
The Board authorized the Chair to sign a Letter of Agreement requesting that the Board of  
County Commissioners act as the County’s agent for the purpose of applying, receiving, and  
disbursing Crime Stoppers Trust dollars for approved Crime Stoppers initiatives in Brevard  
County as provided in Florida Statutes 938.06, with no additional costs being incurred by the  
County, and this request is being made as directed in Florida Statute 16.555(5)(b).  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Katie Delaney  
F.7. Acknowledgement, Re: Bill Folder  
The Board acknowledged receipt of the Bill Folder.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Katie Delaney  
F.4. Resolution to Adopt the Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Program Guidelines  
Chair Altman stated this Item is a resolution to adopt the Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Program  
guidelines.  
Rick Heffelfinger stated he guesses he had a question pertaining to the scores; there are some  
good numbers or bad numbers, and that is what he does not understand; it looks like the  
County is doing a great job making sure it is paying its employees here in Brevard County;  
there is a list, one of the attachments, the Florida Commerce; they did not number the counties,  
but number six, the County is paying people good; his question is if the County is paying so  
good, why were the firefighters paid so poorly, because this must be a total average; and he  
asked if that is correct. He mentioned he would hope that that leveling, and maybe it is because  
they negotiate with a union, so the County tries to squeeze them, but it is reason for cost  
growth; people always say certain organizations are paid underneath what the average is for  
the other counties; that is a pretty good score, but that is costing the taxpayers, all of them, to  
pay those salaries; and he would hope the Board would be looking at that and be saying that  
staff is paid really well, and it wants to get what it pays for. He commented the citizens want the  
same thing; in the past couple of years he has heard these comments about how staff has to  
be given cost of living increases and all that stuff because of the inflation; they are staying up  
nicely, unless the Board thinks that they are all County employees from all over the State are  
paid low; then eighth is not a very good number; he does not know; but that is his observation  
because again, talk of busting the cap, he hopes the County does not throw more money at  
them this time; and he asked if they are going to do a cost increase for their salaries this time  
because they are already eighth.  
Chair Altman asked if Mr. Heffelfinger is speaking on Item F.4., the Ad Valorem Tax Abatement  
Program.  
Mr. Heffelfinger responded yes, it has attachments and one of them is the State of Florida  
incentive average wage.  
Chair Altman commented okay, good, he is talking about that portion of the Agenda, the  
attachment.  
Mr. Heffelfinger responded affirmatively. He noted that drew his attention, the ranking of  
number eighth.  
Chair Altman stated he just wanted to be sure.  
Mr. Heffelfinger commented he could have stapled the wrong thing to it.  
Chair Altman stated that is a good question and he asked if there is a response to that  
question.  
Kathy Wall, Central Services Director, stated each year the Economic Development  
Commissioner (EDC) of Florida’s Space Coast Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Council reviews the  
average wage as Mr. Heffelfinger has said because there are three elements when a person  
applies, a business applies for a tax abatement; the three elements that go into that research  
before they go to the Board; one is the number of employees, one is the payroll, and one is the  
capital investments; at this year’s discussion, with the average wage going to $68,000 per year,  
the Council decided because there is so much in aerospace and heavy manufacturing, there  
needs to be other businesses to support those businesses; therefore, it was decided by the  
council to keep the average wage at $61,784 for this particular program; and the EDC is  
requesting that the Board approve the resolution for this tax abatement program.  
Chair Altman stated he just wanted to be specific to Mr. Heffelfinger’s question.  
Mr. Heffelfinger replied he appreciates the insight.  
Jim Liesenfelt, County Manager, advised this is the economic wage that the EDC uses as part  
of their formula to recommend the tax abatement, it is not the average wage of County  
employees, it is the average wage throughout the entire County.  
Chair Altman stated that is a big fundamental difference.  
Mr. Heffelfinger asked what the abatement actually does; is this going to ask the local  
employers to lower their wage so it is an attractive place to work, or raise their wage; he noted  
he does not know; and he does not know if this score is a good thing or a bad thing.  
Chair Altman stated he thinks it is just an accounting of what the average wage is; and he  
asked if there is a reason for that.  
Ms. Wall responded by saying the reason why the average wage is part of the calculation for  
the tax abatement program is because they will get points; the higher the wage the more points  
they get; the average wage is $61,784 would get them four points; anything below that would  
get zero points; the tax abatement program is based on the number of points a business brings  
to the County; capital investment has a number of points, three through 10; number of  
employees has a number assigned to them, the more people they bring, the larger the number  
they have; and if somebody gets a higher number, they could get an abatement for eight years  
at 80 percent of what they add to the tax roil, or 10 years at 100 percent of what they add to the  
tax roll for that given abatement program. She went on to explain it is just a guide for the tax  
abatement council to recommend to the Board an abatement program for those tax abatement  
programs that come to the Board.  
Mr. Heffelfinger asked if that means the County would give them a waiver on some of their  
business tax because they are bringing in such high-paid individuals into the County.  
Chair Altman asked Mr. Heffelfinger to please go through the Chairman; and he asked him to  
repeat his question.  
Mr. Heffelfinger stated he wondered if that means because there has been some talk about  
these programs where the County gives tax waivers to businesses that come in, and that is  
good if the County gets the tax dollars from employees, that is what happens; they go to the  
stores, shops, buy boats here, so that is good; and he asked if this is a consideration for the  
County authorizing a waiver to some of the business taxes because they brought the  
employees.  
Chair Altman stated he thinks it is a very interesting point that he brings up because he would  
reasonably think that if there was a lower average employment pay, that would be a positive for  
tax abatement because one would need to hire more jobs to increase wages; whereas this is  
the opposite, the higher the wage, the more points one gets, so that would be bias against the  
community that needed more jobs; but maybe there are other reasons because there is a  
higher average wage, one has to be more competitive in bringing in workers; and he asked if  
staff knows the logic behind that.  
Commissioner Feltner commented he hates to summon someone from the office but after Mr.  
Heffelfinger is finished, Neil Johnson is out there in the audience and he might be able to clear  
that up.  
Mr. Heffelfinger stated he would like to thank the Chair for engaging the staff to get him some  
information.  
Chair Altman stated no problem, it is a very intriguing question.  
Commissioner Feltner apologized to Mr. Johnson but he thinks he can clear that up.  
Neil Johnson stated he is the Chair of the ABT Council for the EDC; that was a great  
explanation; the ABT program is designed to give an incentive to so they can recruit companies  
to come to this area that have high paying jobs; those high paying jobs will then create what is  
called direct and indirect jobs beyond that because the speaker rightly said, when bringing in  
those high paying jobs, they will shop in the stores, buy the boats, tourist will stay in the hotels,  
the people will buy houses; the return on investment, and they have done research, is about  
8:1, so for every dollar that is abated in the ad valorem piece of the property taxes, there is  
about an $8 return on investment on the spending that they do in the community; and that is  
the reason that the score sheet gives them credit for higher paying jobs, it is the design of the  
program. He went on to say the reason they bring the average wage to the Board is because of  
State Statutes, it required them to do that; and he can answer any other questions.  
Commissioner Adkinson stated she would like to make a motion to approve the Item.  
Commissioner Feltner stated he seconds the motion; he noted he wants to say one thing  
before the vote; just so everyone is well aware, tax abatement stands on its own; every one has  
to go before the Board of County Commissioners; approving the guidelines today is just that;  
and each one would come before this Board individually.  
Chair Altman replied that is excellent; and he called the question.  
The Board approved and adopted Resolution No. 26-035, acknowledging the guidelines for the  
Brevard County Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Program as recommended by the Economic  
Development Commission of Florida’s Space Coast’s Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Council.  
Result: ADOPTED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Rob Feltner  
F.5. Approval, Re: Appointment(s) / Reappointment(s)  
Chair Altman stated this is approval of appointments and reappointments.  
Commissioner Adkinson stated she thinks the Citizen Advisory Boards are really important not  
just to the community but particularly to her, because they are individuals who are out there that  
she can work with, learn from, and can bring information from the community to her, and for her  
that is important; she has a concern that if the Board allows some of these appointments,  
specifically for the Health Facilities Authority which has been vacant since December 2025, the  
Community Development Block Grant Citizen Advisory Board, vacant since December 24, and  
the North Brevard Commission on Parks and Recreation, there is no one in that seat, she  
thinks the next incoming Commissioner for District 1, it may serve that Commissioner better if  
he or she was allowed to appoint those three particular or at least be part of the decision of the  
Board for those particular three appointments; and that is her thought and she would like to  
make the motion to deny…  
Commissioner Delaney interjected saying she would like to have more discussion on that.  
Commissioner Adkinson responded by saying certainly, she is just going to make the motion  
and see if it gets a second, then the Board can have further discussion; and she would move to  
deny the appointment to the Health Facilities Authority, the Community Development Block  
Grant Citizen Advisory Board, and the North Brevard Commissioner on Parks and Recreation,  
the others are fine.  
Commissioner Goodson stated he would second that.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she has discussion; she understands where Commissioner  
Adkinson is coming from; she and he staff have been looking into these appointments for quite  
some time and it is still under her authority as the District 1 Commissioner; the next District 1  
Commissioner can literally wipeout any board seat that he or she wishes and replace them with  
someone else once they become Commissioner; there is nothing holding he or she back from  
doing so; she does not believe these vacancies should continue; she believes it is part of her  
role as the Commissioner to appoint somebody; and these are the people she has chosen due  
to their experience and willingness to serve. She reiterated the next Commissioner can swap  
them out if he or she so chooses; and she noted she does not think that District 1 should not  
have the representation during that time just because of her situation.  
Commissioner Adkinson pointed out these positions have been vacant for a year and a half.  
Commissioner Delaney stated no they have not, one has.  
Commissioner Adkinson stated Brevard Commission on Parks and Recreation has not had a  
previous member in the seat, West Canaveral Groves Strategy Area since December 2024; in  
any case, she thinks that from a Board’s perspective, it is not a great idea to force the next  
District Commissioner to have to work with people that were not selected by them; and it would  
only be a matter of months before this could possibly be straightened out, if someone is  
appointed for District 1.  
Commissioner Delaney noted all the Commissioners do that; they all did that when they got  
elected; she does not foresee any issues with these people; they are all professionals and  
highly experienced; it is just an insult to the people that have applied to these positions to even  
suggest something like that; these boards are an advisory role, they are not making any  
decisions; and there should be representation in those seats.  
Morris Richardson, County Attorney, asked if he could make a clarification.  
Chair Altman responded affirmatively.  
Attorney Richardson noted that Commissioner Delaney was correct that the incoming  
Commissioner in District 1 could remove and replace appointees if that Commissioner wanted  
to as to two of the boards, TICO is a District 1 Commissioner appointment for that particular  
seat and the Marine Advisory Council appointment; both of those are acknowledgements; the  
Commissioner has in effect made those and the Board is just being asked to acknowledge  
those; as to the remaining, the CDBG, the Health Facilities Authority, and the North Brevard  
Library, North Brevard Parks and Recreation, and North Merritt island, those are all Board  
appointments; and North Merritt Island specifically, must be recommended by the District 2  
Commissioner, and the Board acts upon that recommendation, in an advice and consent  
manner.  
Chair Altman stated so the Board is talking about four appointments.  
Commissioner Adkinson replied it is three appointments.  
Chair Altman asked what those were.  
Commissioner Adkinson responded by saying Health Facilities Authority, CDBG Citizens  
Advisory Board, and the North Brevard Commission on Parks and Recreation.  
Chair Altman asked if the motion is for those three.  
Commissioner Adkinson replied affirmatively, stated the other ones stand.  
Commissioner Delaney stated from what she was told, those boards were District 1  
appointments approved by the Board.  
Attorney Richardson advised that is not correct; he explained TICO and Marine Advisory  
Council are District Commissioner appointments, the others are Board appointments.  
The Board approved the appointments/reappointments of Adam Popp to the Marine Advisory  
Council, Joyce Jeffrey to the North Brevard Public Library Advisory Board, John Hopengarten  
to the Titusville-Cocoa Airport Authority, and Frank Golan to the North Merritt Island Dependent  
Special District Board; and denied the appointments/reappointments of John Holmquist to the  
Community Development Block Grant Citizens Advisory Board (West Canaveral Groves), Maya  
Widmeyer to the Health Facilities Authority, and Joyce Jeffrey to the North Brevard  
Commission on Parks and Recreation.  
Result: APPROVED AS AMENDED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Tom Goodson  
Commissioner Altman inquired if there needs to be a larger motion or if that one covered  
disposing of that Item.  
Commissioner Adkinson stated the way she worded it was…  
Attorney Richardson replied everything else went through, the North Brevard Library and North  
Merritt Island were both approved by the Board.  
Commissioner Adkinson agreed.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she had thought when she spoke with Kathy Wall, Central  
Services Director, about this that she has an appointment on the TICO board, a District 1  
appointment; she has an appointment on the Health Facilities Authority; and from that spread  
sheet she was provided that is what it said, District 1, it did not say Board.  
Ms. Wall stated she is not sure what spreadsheet it is, but she looked at every one of these  
appointments; the appointment for the CDBG, the appointment for the Health Facilities  
Authority, and the appointment for the North Brevard Commission on Parks and Recreation,  
the way the legislation is written, those are Board appointments.  
Commissioner Delaney stated that is not the information that was given; and she asked about  
TICO.  
Ms. Wall advised that is a District appointment.  
Attorney Richardson clarified that is what he said, TICO and Marine Advisory Council are just  
acknowledgements from the Board; Commissioner Delaney made those appointments; those  
are District 1 Commissioner appointments.  
Commissioner Delaney stated so those are done.  
Attorney Richardson responded affirmatively about those two.  
G.  
PUBLIC COMMENTS (Individuals may not speak under both the first and second  
public comment sections.)  
Jeanette Egerton stated she is going to read; they had started a petition for the trees that are  
going to be cut down, or they are planning to be cut down; there was some discussion about  
that in the community so they started a petition; they got over 120 homes, with 192 in the  
community; they were pleasantly surprised that they received more than half; and she read,  
“We the undersigned residents, supporters of the Hammock Trace Community, respectfully  
urge you to halt the planned removal of approximately 60 mature Oak trees within our  
neighborhood and to consider alternative solutions that preserve the natural environment we  
value so deeply. The trees in our community, are not merely part of our landscape, they are  
essential to our health, beauty, and character of our neighborhood. Many of us choose to live  
here because of the rich tree canopy and sense of peace and connection to nature that it  
provides. The mature Oak tree is capable of supporting over 2,300 species. These trees  
provide vital food, shelter, and habitat for wildlife contributing to a thriving and balanced  
ecosystem. In addition to their ecological importance, these trees offer significant everyday  
benefits. To residents, they provide shade from the intense Florida sun that we’re all familiar  
with, making our streets more walkable and enjoyable for families, children, pets, to help  
regulate temperatures, reduce energy costs, and enhance overall quality of life. The removal of  
these trees would have lasting negative impacts including those already mentioned, loss of  
wildlife habitat, increased heat and reduced shade, increased energy costs for residents,  
decreased property values, and neighborhood appeal.” She mentioned one of the reasons she  
bought in there was because of the beautiful Oak trees, and if she has not said that she wanted  
to make she did; she stated they are talking about 60 trees being taken out of the easement  
area and she is not sure why; that is one of her questions at the end; this outcome was not  
what the residents want for the community, nor what was envisioned at the time Hammock  
Trace was developed; the residents urge Brevard County to look into nearby communities such  
as Titusville, where thoughtful tree protection policies have been successfully implemented  
through citizen advocacy and city leadership; Titusville established regulations which she  
knows they have them in place, but she does not have the numbers at this point in time,  
requiring preservation existing tree canopy protection of heritage trees of which there are many  
because she has been there for over 30 years, and the developer contributions towards tree  
mitigation; these measures demonstrate that responsible development and environment  
preservation can go hand-in-hand; and the residents believe community involvement is  
essential, not just individual homes, in decision that shape the community. She went on to say  
the residents would respectfully ask that the Board pause all plans to remove these trees,  
engage in residents to explore alternative solutions and consider implementing stronger  
tree-protection measures; and she asked how people will know what the Board’s decision is  
and how will the residents be kept apprised of that in the future.  
Chair Altman stated he has a question.  
Commissioner Feltner advised there are three cards on the trees and he and Marc Bernath,  
Public Works Director, are happy to speak on it if Chair Altman prefers to do that.  
Chair Altman stated them the Board can hear all three, but he has a question for this speaker;  
and he asked about the top picture.  
Ms. Egerton advised that pictures is one of Pats.  
Chair Altman stated then he will wait, although he thinks he knows the answer.  
Patrick French stated he is going to give a quick history; he has been there since 1960, South  
Patrick Shores; he joined the Marine Corps in 1980, retired in 2000, went to Viera and thought  
what is that, drove around with the wife and found that area over in Hammock Trace, and he’s  
been there for 26 years; like Ms. Egerton said the trees are just beautiful; that picture was sent  
to him by one of his neighbors; he has more pictures but the Board does not have time to be  
looking at pictures all day long; and to him, it is devastating and he does not like it.  
Chair Altman interjected by saying this is a depiction, like a photoshop picture, where the trees  
were removed.  
Mr. French stated someone from the neighborhood sent that to him to give him an idea of what  
it would be.  
Chair Altman stated it is a great graphic.  
Mr. French continued by saying he has pictures here of one of the streets that looks like that,  
but he does not want to keep passing pictures out, this is just giving an idea of what is going  
on.  
Chair Altman stated they are worth a thousand words.  
Mr. French stated they really are; he cannot sleep at night when he sees that; this place, it is  
beautiful; he has been there 26 years; his tree is probably one of the bigger ones; it has only  
been shaved, and staff knows this, but one can lift the sidewalk, cut the roots, and then cement  
and form it back up, and it is done; his has only been shaved once to make it level with the  
other part of the sidewalk, once in 26 years; the trees here and there are going to lift, they are  
getting big, they are beautiful Oaks, but it does not happen all the time, it is intervals of about  
every five years; if they were to come out there and do the sidewalks and lift where they need  
to be lifted in front of the trees, cut the roots, he has seen it a thousand times out there; as a  
matter of fact, they were just over at Spyglass about three months ago doing it, not hurting the  
trees; and last week they were over at Crane Creek, not hurting the trees. He noted it kills him  
to see that picture; he looked at it too many times; he does not carry it with him any longer he  
just brought it for the Board; there are places in our little community there in Hammock Trace  
that needs to be either shaved of the sidewalk lifted, then voila, the tree is still there; these  
trees are awesome; the kids play there, people walk around with their dogs, the babies; if he  
wanted to live in a desert he probably should have stayed in the Marine Corps by that picture, it  
is just decimated and ugly; the neighborhood will never be the same; he has a couple years  
left, but he is saying if they were to come and do that; his is lifting a tiny bit now, after 26 years,  
actually 30, because in 95 he thinks they put it in; he probably would not be here if they did the  
sidewalks, three panels of the cement, he does not think it would lift 15-20 years later, and he  
probably would not be around by the time they had to do something to it again; he does not  
want to lose the trees; and the picture says it all, so he does not have to say too much. He  
asked if the Board has any questions for him.  
Chair Altman stated no questions.  
Mr. French noted he provided Commissioner Feltner with the petition.  
Commissioner Feltner replied he has everything and he will speak after the last speaker.  
Chelsey True stated hers is not about the trees and asked if the Board wanted her to wait.  
Chair Altman stated to wait then, and to bring this back to the Board.  
Commissioner Feltner stated there is a neighborhood in Hammock Trace, it is a lovely  
neighborhood; if one were to take Spyglass all the way to where it intersect Murrell and go  
across, hang a right, one would be in Hammock Trace; he has friends in there and was in there  
last week; he spoke with Mr. French on Good Friday; he met with a couple of the neighbors and  
walk around the sidewalks; the short of it is, and they do have majestic and beautiful Oak trees  
that are 30 years old, as he thinks the neighborhood is about 30 years old, the trees are  
between the sidewalk and the street, so there is that thin strip of grass and that is where they  
placed the trees; conversely in his neighborhood, they put two live Oaks in all of their front  
yards; he had to remove his because it buckled the driveway, caused other problems after the  
04 hurricanes, and all those sort of things; and anyone who has the Oak trees has to deal with  
them, but they are beautiful trees, no debating that fact. He continued by saying the situation is  
that the County does take care of the sidewalks, they are not behind a gate; there are now  
sidewalks that are raised up, therefore, there are American Disabilities Act (ADA) concerns with  
that; now, they can grind some tops of the sidewalks, but there are definitely some areas that  
are going to have to be addressed; he went out there and walked with one neighbor and there  
are five inches, so that is not shaving the top of the sidewalk; and he talked with Mr. Bernath,  
just so everyone understands, nothing is moving forward today, everyone is on pause until it  
can be figured out. He noted the County does not want to go out there and cut all the trees  
down; he would suggest to everyone that it is a lot cheaper fi the County did not have to do  
that; the County is going to find a good way to do it; there will definitely have to be some root  
trimming to deal with the sidewalks; he has heard this term where the sidewalk can be lifted,  
trim the root, put the sidewalk down, but he does not think the County quite thinks it happens  
like that; he thinks it needs to be repoured; there are places in Suntree, since he has been a  
Commissioner, where they have had to repour individual segments; when he first got here  
Interlocking was finishing up that ditch work and several pieces of the sidewalk individually  
were broken because heavy equipment were driving across doing the ditch work; that went on  
for a while; and he will say the contractor that County had at that time, did a very good job of  
getting out there pretty quick and doing it; and they want to be very respectful, and make sure  
they do it right. He went on to say he thinks his office is trying to plan a meeting with the  
residents here, and they are the contacts for that; that will be done before the County moves  
forward with any plans; and that is where they are today.  
Chair Altman stated he was a longtime resident of Viera; in this case, Viera had experienced it  
as well; they have a beautiful Oak tree in the middle of their yard, was between the house and  
the sidewalk; he did not realizes they were between the sidewalk and the road, which  
complicates factors; it is the same thing, sidewalk is lifted; it is amazing what the Oaks in this  
part of Florida will do to raise sidewalks, probably because of the high water table; he has lived  
this issue and still lives it as a property owner in Viera; he is a part of the community and  
appreciates what Commissioner Feltner does there; and he has a couple of questions about  
this. He went on to say this is a huge issue, and of course everyone knows about the tree battle  
on Rockledge Drive, it was legendary, and still is; this is an issue that will not go away and  
ultimately affect all Districts; one of the things that comes to his mind and he thought this,  
maybe the Board needs to look at the Subdivision Codes, Site Plan approval codes, that  
whenever a sidewalk is put it that it is put in properly; included in that, may be the need to put in  
what is called tree wells, a thickened footer on the edge of the sidewalk between where any  
tree would be planted to help create a wall to prevent those roots from going right under the  
sidewalk and lift it up; that is just a thought; and maybe when the Board looks at the Code, it  
might want to evaluate that from this point going forward. He continued by saying his second  
question is and he would assume the County would bear the cost of doing all of those repairs,  
and he asked what would be the revenue source, an Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU)  
tax that would benefit the local residents; he commented that maybe the County should apply a  
certain percentage of the MSTU to fixing these problems; and also, he would love to see a poll  
from the neighborhood of how many want to keep the trees and how many want to take them  
out, it would be interesting for him.  
Commissioner Feltner stated he is going to concede that election, that point; he knows the  
results of it.  
Chair Altman asked, really.  
Commissioner Feltner replied affirmatively; he stated he thinks probably most folks can agree  
that yes there are a few problematic areas that have to be addressed; he wants to be  
sympathetic to the rest that they are not all sort of just broadly done; to address the key things,  
he has heard the border-type situation that Chair Altman described, with keeping the roots from  
doing this again; it is 30 years old, so that is probably the manifestation of 30 years of root  
growth; if these things could be addressed, they are probably going to be, and he hopes the  
Board are still all around when or if roots do this again, but probably going to take care of the  
lion’s share of it; he thinks to the point of talking about Code and such, he does not think the  
County allows for these trees to be that close now in the modern neighborhoods; one knows  
that is a problem; he thinks staff makes sure there is enough setback for all that; it is not just  
the sidewalk, they have utilities there; he was looking at the water meters and all of those  
things; and one good part he notices, and just happenstance really, that he notices, thinking  
about Rockledge Drive to Chair Altman’s point, it does not seem that they have a height  
problem, so it is not a truck going through there and hitting the limbs, that was a different thing  
in Rockledge. He stated it is not always just what is happening underneath or always what is on  
top, it is kind of a combination of both; he thinks their problem is exclusively roots; he thinks  
staff can get there and find a solution for the neighborhood that is not going to have a liability  
problem for the County, ultimately, that is where they have to be; and again, if they were behind  
a gate, the Board would not be having this conversation.  
Chair Altman stated that is interesting; he looks forward to hearing the report; he knows the  
constituents are in good hands; he looks forward to this coming back; this definitely has a  
Countywide impact; this is a big issue; he works at the Cape and at the Astronaut Memorial  
Park there was massive destruction of all the walkways where they had to rip them out and put  
gravel replacement down; that seems to be working, but these Oak trees are powerful; and it is  
amazing what they can do. He advised he is fascinated to hear what Commissioner Feltner  
comes back with. He thanked the speakers for coming and commented that is why there is a  
public part of the Agenda, it is very informative.  
Chelsey True stated she is a Merritt Island resident and she wanted to speak today about  
public trust and the process, especially as it relates to active rezoning matters currently before  
this Board; over the past several months, residents have been following a rezoning case,  
25Z00054; that case has now gone through multiple continuances with explanations that the  
project is still evolving due to land acquisition and outreach; at the same time, public records  
show that the applicant’s registered lobbyist has had multiple contacts with County leadership  
while this matter remains unresolved; additionally, they have become aware that this same  
individual is under contract with the County for State lobbying services; and that contract  
appears to include related conflicts and restrictions on lobbying on behalf of private developers  
during the term of the agreement. She continued by saying she is not making any accusations,  
but from a residents perspective, when these overlapping roles exist, it raises questions about  
how those provisions are being interpreted and whether appropriate disclosures have been  
made; additionally there are still open questions about how this project would function from an  
access and infrastructure stand point; for example, based on publicly available information, she  
has not been able to locate any Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) permit or  
application related to the proposed access points associated with this development; and she  
has also spoken to the project manager for this specific project. She mentioned if key elements  
like access and traffic mitigations depend on approvals that are not yet in place, it adds to the  
concern that the project may still be evolving in ways that are still not fully visible to the public;  
when a project continues to change between hearings and residents are trying to understand  
what is actually being proposed, it creates a perception that the full picture is not always clear  
in real time, perception matters; because when residents are showing up, asking questions,  
and still struggling to get a consistent understanding of the project, it can erode confidence in  
the process itself; and she is simply asking for clarity and transparency. She added as this  
application moves forward, she respectfully ask that any material changes, as well as any  
relevant disclosures and outstanding approvals be clearly presented so that both the Board and  
the public can evaluate the matter in full confidence; and she would also beg the Board to give  
weight to the Merritt Island Redevelopment Agency (MIRA)’s unanimous no and the no majority  
vote for Planning and Zoning twice, and the continuous community outreach to ensure that the  
people are heard.  
Chair Altman stated he has a request that Ms. True’s concern be placed in writing so that the  
County Attorney can address that.  
Ms. True replied affirmatively.  
H.1. Permission to Participate in and Accept the U.S. Dept. of Justice (DOJ) Edward  
Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Local Solicitation - Brevard County  
Sheriff’s Office.  
Chair Altman called for a public hearing for the Brevard County Sheriff’s Department’s request  
for permission to participate in and accept the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Edward Byrne  
Memorial Justice Assistance Grant application.  
Jim Liesenfelt, County Manager, stated this is permission to participate and accept the U.S.  
Department of Justice Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant; this is an Item the  
Board sees every year; this is the second time it has been in front of the Board; the last  
meeting was to request this public hearing; this is for the Sheriff’s Office to accept the grant;  
the award would be $48,444; and the award will enhance criminal investigations by funding a  
deputy agent position that focuses on forensic fraud referring to crimes in which somebody  
wrongfully obtains and uses another person’s personal data.  
The Board granted permission to participate in and accepted the Edward Byrne Memorial  
Justice Assistance Grant application; designated the Brevard County Sheriff’s Office as the  
point of contact; and authorized the Chair to execute the necessary contractual agreements,  
modifications, and amendments and authorized the County Manager to execute necessary  
Budget Change Requests.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Rob Feltner  
Seconder: Kim Adkinson  
Ayes: Delaney, Goodson, Adkinson, Feltner, and Altman  
H.2. Petition to Vacate, Re: A portion of a public utility easement - Plat of “South  
Merritt Estates Pineland Section”, Plat Book 14, Page 101 - Merritt Island - Jeffrey  
N. Mathis - District 2  
Chair Altman called for a petition to vacate a portion of a public utility easement, Plat of “Couth  
Merritt Estates Pineland Section”, Plat Book 14, Page 101, located in Merritt Island and  
requested by Jeffrey N. Mathis.  
Marc Bernath, Public Works Director, stated this Item is a petition to vacate a portion of a  
public utility easement south of Highway 520 and south of Courtenay Parkway on Merritt Island;  
Mr. Mathis is the owner, in District 2; and they are requesting a portion of a public utility  
easement to be vacated to allow an existing storage facility to remain that was discovered  
during a an unrelated Code enforcement case; and there are no objections.  
There being no comments or objections, the Board adopted Resolution No. 26-036, vacating a  
portion of a public utility easement, Plat of “South Merritt Estates Pineland Section”, Merritt  
Island, Florida, lying in Section 13, Township 25 South, Range 36 East, as petitioned by Jeffrey  
N. Mathis.  
Result: ADOPTED  
Mover: Tom Goodson  
Seconder: Katie Delaney  
Ayes: Delaney, Goodson, Adkinson, Feltner, and Altman  
I.1.  
Request Approval to Advertise a Request for Proposal for a Boating  
Infrastructure Study  
Chair Altman stated this Item requests approval to advertise a request for proposal for a  
boating infrastructure study.  
Rick Heffelfinger stated his question was he believes this was brought up earlier by  
Commissioner Adkinson about looking at reevaluating what the County is charging for boat  
registration fees; he does not see any numbers, he sees one number, $80,000 to $100,000 for  
a study; he sees a reference to a County boating improvement fund; and he was wondering if  
the Board could discuss or provide some information at its discretion, of how much is in the  
County Boating Improvement Fund right now, and what is going to be the return on investment  
for spending $80,000 to $100,000 to study the problem, if there is a problem. He commented  
maybe that is just a reevaluation that is done routinely, he does not know; he wonders why the  
County is going to spend, and he does not know what fund that comes out of, General Fund  
maybe for the $80,000 to $100,000, he does not know and he does not think is says it; and he  
reiterated he just wants to know the return on investment for a study, how much money they  
have, and what they think they need from the study, maybe it is looking to grow that fund for  
some reason; that is all he had if the Board can answer those questions he would appreciate it.  
Commissioner Adkinson stated this Item is coming back to the Board because of Board  
direction on March 17; she thanked staff for getting this done so quickly; she expected this to  
be done in May, but it is early and that is fantastic; the direction from the Board was to prepare  
a Request for Proposal (RFP) that will study the current state of and need for expansion of  
County infrastructure that falls within the approved uses of the Brevard Boating Improvement  
Program; the money this may cost, somewhere between $80,000 and $100,000, is in a fund  
that is specific to these things and is not the General Fund; it has the potential to generate over  
$460,000 per year extra, and can only go towards specific things; it can only go toward  
providing, maintaining, and operating recreational channel marking and other waterway  
markers, public boat ramps, lifts, and hoists, marine railways, boat piers, docks, mooring  
buoys, and other public launching facilities; also in removing derelict vessels and debris that  
specifically impede boat access, not including the dredging of canals, also vessels and floating  
structures deemed hazardous; this is the County getting approval to go out and get the study  
completed; and she asked if there is anything else that staff would like to say about that.  
Ian Golden, Parks and Recreation Director, stated he would like to add that this would actually  
help the Department with planning for the next five to 10 years as they look at expending and  
obligating funds to different projects, something that staff will be looking at within the RFP is  
actually prioritization regarding some of those needs that the Department has moving forward.  
The Board approved to advertise a Request for Proposal for a Boating Infrastructure Study;  
authorized the County Manager to execute a contract with the Consultant that the Selection  
and Negotiating Committee recommends and has found to have the most experience with a  
Boating Infrastructure Study and has submitted the most responsive proposal; and authorized  
the County Manager to approve the necessary budget amendment (BCR) to execute the  
contract.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Katie Delaney  
Ayes: Delaney, Goodson, Adkinson, and Altman  
Nay: Feltner  
J.1. Approval, Re: Write off uncollectible ambulance debt associated with Emergency  
Medical Services (EMS) accounts for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024 and 2025 related to  
the closure of accounts associated with Change Healthcare; and to approve the  
annual write-off of uncollectible EMS-Management & Consultants ambulance  
debt for January 1, 2025, through September 30, 2025.  
Chief Patrick Voltaire, Fire Rescue Director, stated this is write off of uncollectible ambulance  
debt associated with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) accounts for Fiscal Years 2024 and  
2025; in accordance with BCC-37, Brevard County Fire Rescue refers appropriate delinquent  
accounts to contracted collection agencies for further recovery actions; for all these accounts,  
this action does not preclude continued collection efforts in future years; for the average of the  
two year write-off rate, it is an average of 39.6 percent with a seven year average being 41  
percent; and Fire Rescue requests Board approval in accordance with Resolution No. 79-21 for  
Fiscal Years 2024 and 2025 write-offs of uncollectible EMS accounts receivable and the  
closure of accounts associated with Change Healthcare and EMS Management and  
Consultants.  
Rick Heffelfinger stated her is his concern, the County is writing off, which means the County or  
EMS is not getting money for services that were provided; he will make the assumption, and he  
knows what happens when one makes assumptions, that that is a true statement; those guys  
are working hard, getting paid, picking people up, and those people are welching on their bill;  
the Board can clarify if that is true; he thinks what that means is instead of the people receiving  
the service, paying for the service, the taxpayers are because the County is not shortening their  
paychecks, and they are still doing their job; that amount of write-off really bothers him; he does  
not know if the County is writing-off Medicare or something, makes a minimum payment,  
because insurance is a mystery to him still; but when the County bills someone for $400, and  
Medicare pays $200, the County eats $200 because the County cost was $500, it eats $300,  
his math is foggy this morning; and he asked if that is what is being written off, something that  
the County never anticipated in getting because insurance did not cover it, or is the County  
actually issuing a bill saying it is the persons responsible who rode in the ambulance and they  
just say, “I don’t know.” He asked if the collection is against the individual person.  
Chair Altman stated he thinks those are all good questions, let the Chief respond.  
Mr. Heffelfinger stated that was his question because it is a lot of money that is not coming into  
this County and he would hate to think the taxpayers are making up the difference.  
Chief Voltaire stated that is a good point; the Medicare Medicaid Tricare contracted rate is all  
separate from this; a better word, people that either cannot or will not pay their bill is what this  
number is that is being seen today; and he thinks there was a third question but does not  
remember what it was.  
Chair Altman asked if Mr. Heffelfinger remembers.  
Mr. Heffelfinger stated EMS is being compensated for the difference though. The County is  
making it up to them.  
Chief Voltaire stated part his statement was they will continue with the collection agency; that  
number does not preclude continued collections; say somebody is making a $5 a month  
payment, that will continue to trickle in; so…  
Mr. Heffelfinger stated people that did not respond, and he assumes they receive a lien on their  
credit, or do they receive a lien from the County, he is not sure; but they are financially  
impacted, but staff is going to say they did not respond, there is no chance they are going to  
pay, and the County is writing it off; and he asked if that is what the write-off part is.  
Chief Voltaire stated it is a write-off to clear the books today, but they will continue collection  
efforts moving forward on these accounts.  
Mr. Heffelfinger commented so the County will continue to ping them.  
Chief Voltaire responded affirmatively.  
Mr. Heffelfinger continued by saying but they will assume they may not get anything.  
Chief Voltaire stated exactly.  
Mr. Heffelfinger continued by saying and if it does, it reports that as additional income the next  
year, and say they got some of that back; and he noted he is really concerned about the size of  
what the County is expending resources for; and he asked if the County needs to be meaner to  
people who do not respond to their bills. He stated he knows they cannot be denied service, the  
doctor must provide services; the County cannot tell them not to get their own ride or call a  
Uber; he does not know how to deal with that; but it does affect his taxes, he thinks, if the  
County is making up the difference.  
Chair Altman stated it is a tough issue; he has a questions; this is a little bit of a bookkeeping  
thing then; and the County is writing off what it would call bad debt expense in private sector.  
Chief Voltaire responded by saying yes sir, bookkeeping.  
Chair Altman went on to say but they will still make efforts to collect.  
Chief Voltaire responded affirmatively.  
Chair Altman mentioned another question he wants to clarify because it did come up; and he  
asked if there will a lien placed on the property for lack of pay.  
Chief Voltaire replied he does not think so.  
Chair Altman asked so he does not think that is being done in this particular place.  
Chief Voltaire replied by saying no.  
Chair Altman asked if any jurisdictions do that.  
Chief Voltaire replied no not that he is aware of.  
Commissioner Delaney stated when he says they continue the efforts to retrieve the money  
that includes litigation; and she asked if that is correct.  
Matt Wallace, Public Safety Director, stated it can, up to litigation; the collection agency has a  
process defined that they will go through based on the time and the amount; and then it is their  
call as they use those processes of how far they want to go.  
Commissioner Delaney asked when it comes to the hacking that went on with that third party  
agency, they are still going through that process of trying to retrieve those funds and all of that.  
Mr. Wallace responded affirmatively.  
Chair Altman commented that is another issue that was not even talked about in the briefing;  
and this is the outgrowth of the cyberattack, if Mr. Heffelfinger is not aware of that.  
Mr. Heffelfinger noted he did see the notice and he just stuck to that page; he did not know  
about the cyberattack; and he asked if somebody ripped off money from the County.  
Chair Altman asked Mr. Wallace to provide a quick description, he thinks it helps.  
Mr. Wallace stated it is a separate issue, but connected; Change Healthcare experienced a  
cyberattack in 2024; staff is going through the process now to identify the impact of those  
revenues that potentially could be lost; part of that is working with the County Attorney’s Office  
right now for a demand to get that data being brought back to the County; and once that data is  
received, they will be able to analyze it and go through the processes, potential audits, to  
determine that magnitude and the proper steps going forward.  
Mr. Heffelfinger stated he hopes the County makes that company that let the cyberattack  
happen pay the lawyer fees; and Morris Richardson, County Attorney, needs to get money from  
them for his efforts, not from the people, so go get them.  
Chair Altman stated this is a serious problem.  
Commissioner Feltner asked how indigents are handled; does EMS have nothing to bill, or  
does it bill Medicaid; and how is it paid for.  
Chief Voltaire stated Medicaid, Medicare is at the contracted rate; he wants to say around $250  
or $300 is the standard rate that they will pay; and that is the contracted Federal rate.  
Commissioner Feltner stated so that is 30 percent of what somebody else is going to pay; that  
is what the Federal Government is going to pay the County for indigent folks; he asked what  
about folks from out of town, they do not have anything to lien; he stated he knows that  
question came up about lien on property, but he is not sure that can be done for an ambulance  
ride, but certainly collections probably report to credit agencies; and he asked if that is correct.  
Chief Voltaire stated he does not believe that this…  
Commissioner Feltner interjected by saying that this one does because of the nature of it being  
medical.  
Chief Voltaire responded by saying yes sir.  
Commissioner Feltner stated that has to be a problem when there are out of town folks and not  
even a resident of Florida; and he asked if that changes their ability to collect from them versus  
folks who live here.  
Mr. Wallace stated no, the collection agency can go nationwide to try to find those folks; some  
of the issues might be if there is not good contact information when the service is provided,  
maybe a detailed address, phone number, or that kind of stuff; and then the collection agencies  
try to run those folks down; and every ambulance ride bill that is produced and that is not paid  
for goes to the collection agency and they make a due diligence to try and collect it.  
Commissioner Feltner inquired he thinks maybe it was mentioned, to refresh his recollection,  
when someone is in a Coastal ambulance and they did not pay, is it largely Coastal’s problem.  
Chief Voltaire stated it is 100 percent Coastal’s problem.  
The Board approved in accordance with Resolution No. 79-21, for the FY 2024 and FY 2025  
write offs of uncollectible EMS accounts receivable and the closure of accounts associated with  
Change Healthcare and EMS-Management and Consultants ambulance debt for January 1,  
2025, through September 30, 2025.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Katie Delaney  
Ayes: Delaney, Goodson, Adkinson, Feltner, and Altman  
J.2. Settlement of Atlantic Housing Partners L.L.L.P., et al v. Brevard County, Case  
No. 6:23-CV-02473-CEM-DCI in the United States District Court for the Middle  
District of Florida, Orlando Division.  
Morris Richardson, County Attorney, stated this Item is the proposed settlement of a case  
known as Atlantic Housing Partners et al v. Brevard County that was filed in the United States  
District Court for the Middle District of Florida in 2023; Commissioners Feltner and Goodson  
were the only ones on the Board when the events giving rise to that litigation happened, but  
essentially, the Board at that time denied a request from someone who had gone through the  
Housing Finance Authority process for tax-exempt private activity bond financing for proposed  
development within the City of West Melbourne; the Board heard strong objections from the city  
as well as area residents, and took those into account; and the Board did not elect to give  
preferential bond financing treatment to that developer. He went on to say the developer sued  
under the Florida and Federal Fair Housing Acts claiming $14 million; the County prevailed at  
summary judgment; they have appealed the case to the 11 Circuit Court of Appeals in Federal  
Court; there was a mediation last week and have agreed to settle the case with them paying  
$125,000 of the County’s fees and costs and dismissing the appeal and the lawsuit; that was  
accepted by the County’s outside claims adjuster; and he would strongly urge the Commission  
to accept that as well.  
Commissioner Feltner stated if there are no questions or any other debate he will make the  
motion to approve.  
The Board approved the mediated settlement between Brevard County and the plaintiffs; and  
authorized the Chair and County Attorney to sign a settlement agreement, release, and related  
documents as necessary and appropriate.  
Result: APPROVED  
Mover: Rob Feltner  
Seconder: Katie Delaney  
Ayes: Delaney, Goodson, Adkinson, Feltner, and Altman  
J.3. Improving Agenda Transparency Through Financial Disclosure  
Chair Altman stated this is approving Agenda transparency through financial disclosure; he has  
a point of order on this; and he asked if the Board had voted on this before.  
Morris Richardson, County Attorney, stated the Board did previously and because it is a motion  
for reconsideration, the Board follows BCC-97 and under BCC-97, the Board follows Robert’s  
Rules of Order, generally; under Robert’s Rules one can only make a motion for  
reconsideration at the same meeting in which a vote is taken; in order to hear this Item, the  
Board would need to do two things first; one, pursuant to BCC-97 (3)k, the Board would have to  
have a majority vote of the Board to suspend Robert’s Rules of Order and two, a separate  
motion to reconsider the Board’s action at the prior meeting; and if both of those pass, the  
Board can address the subject of the Agenda.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she has a point of order on that; what her request is today is  
to…  
Chair Altman stated he had a point so he needs to dispose of that first; under Robert’s Rules of  
Order if there is a motion to reconsider it must be made by a member of the prevailing party;  
and he asked if that is correct.  
Attorney Richardson stated that is correct but in this instance if the Board waives Robert’s  
Rules to even consider it, then that does not apply either.  
Chair Altman stated he thinks what is needed is either a motion from the prevailing party to  
reconsider or a motion to not follow Robert’s Rules of Order; there is a reason for that, it is to  
prevent it from rehashing these items; and he asked if Commissioner Delaney has a question.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she objects that this is a reconsideration; what she is doing,  
under the Board authority, the Board has the authority to make changes to Policy; what the  
motion was at the previous meeting was to direct staff to do this; now this time she is proposing  
the changes; and she feels like that is two different things.  
Attorney Richardson stated if he may address that, the requested action is once again to direct  
staff to revise the Policy and reading from the Commissioner’s Agenda Items, it says the Item  
is being brought back for the Board’s reconsideration; he believes the reconsideration rules  
apply; and it is the Board’s preference.  
Chair Altman stated as Chairman he agrees with that; he was going to make that a ruling as  
Chair; and he thinks what is in order is if anybody wants to consider this a motion would be in  
order to waive Robert’s Rules of Order or a motion from the prevailing party to reconsider this  
item.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she would like to make the motion to waive Robert’s Rules.  
Motion dies for lack of a second.  
Chair Altman advised the Board’s original action stands from the last meeting.  
Commissioner Delaney advised there is a card.  
Chair Altman advised Item J.3. is not being heard, it was disposed of in the last meeting and it  
died.  
A public speaker asked if he can make a comment on it during Public Comment now that there  
are rules about discussing something that is on the Agenda.  
Chair Altman stated he can comment whatever he wants to, there is no limit under Public  
Comment.  
K.  
PUBLIC COMMENTS (Individuals may not speak under both the first and second  
public comment sections.)  
Rick Heffelfinger stated now that the Item is off the Agenda he would like to talk about it a little;  
waiving Robert’s Rules, he inquired how many times he has seen, he does not have a specific  
list, where the Board is pretty fast and loose with Robert’s Rules around here; maybe it was  
more previous, he thinks Chair Altman does a better job; this Item was trying to push for some  
transparency; Commissioner Delaney is on her way out; he asked if this Board not just cut her  
a little slack, hear the Item, and reconsider; he noted she is trying to leave something that she  
started and she has to go now, not her choice, an opportunity; and this Board will block it at  
every opportunity. He continued by saying he hears a lot of pushback; she is leaving give her a  
gift; at least do not try to block her Agenda that she promised to the people, that she was going  
to get some transparency; the Board does not seem to want to do anything with that; it looks  
bad and the optics are bad that this Board does not really want to hear from the people; he  
does not know if that is true; again, he assumes and makes an ass out of both when one does  
that; but it is for her constituents and she promised this stuff. He went on to say he does not  
know what their constituents think, he would be concerned; the Board looks like it is blocking  
transparency and openness, and care showing some concern because this is not just for  
District 1; this is for everybody in the County who wants to come up do a Citizens Efficiency  
and Effectiveness Recommendation (CEER), have some time, have a Policy that says it is  
going to be heard and there is going to actually be some action; people will get it in writing;  
people make a comment by just going through and making a suggestion to the County; and he  
asked if that is written down anywhere. He stated that is what he said with the garbage, he is  
going to follow up and say when the garbage contract comes up, that he made some  
suggestions and if the Board will talk about those; he hopes that Don Walker, Space Coast  
Government Television (SCGTV) Director, is passing that along, but he does not know that; the  
CEER is a documented thing; the Board can either says yay or nay, and then the people can  
go, wow; he tried to help, he will try again next year; or they do not do that, maybe there is  
another avenue; but not supporting that program looks bad, it does; and that is all he had to  
say about that one. He added he really does not like the fact that it seems like ever since  
Commissioner Delaney has been in this position, the people hate to see her go, and there is  
hope to get somebody that continues that, but this Board is brutal to her.  
L.1. Jim Liesenfelt, County Manager  
Jim Liesenfelt, County Manager, stated he has a handout for each on an Item to talk about; he  
already handed a copy to the Clerk; with Commissioner Delaney leaving on May 2, he put  
together a sheet more of talking points for him to discuss with the Board, options for District 1  
office during the vacancy; the County had this case back with Commissioner Lober, he believes  
it was 2022; there was also the same issue with Commissioner Zonka in 2023 or 2024, of how  
to keep the office operating and the staff members; and there are four different discussion  
points or ideas. He noted one, is to retain the remaining District 1 staff member, Kristin Lortie;  
the other two member have resigned, or will be resigning, and no longer employed as of May 2;  
two, appoint an interim District 1 staff member as appointing authority for the office; three, is  
other Commissioner offices take the calls, emails, and other communications; four, County staff  
takes phone calls, emails, and other communications; underneath are some talking points on  
there to consider such as how often would the office be open, how would citizen input be routed  
to other Commissioners if it is handles by other Commission offices, what to do with Policy  
issues if staff is handling it, or how to go about appointing staff members; and what staff is  
looking for is the Board to give direction on who the appointing authority staff-wise would be for  
the office while it is vacant. He continued by saying, to remind everybody, under Commissioner  
Lober it was in April and the Governor did not fill that position, it was filled by an election in  
November; with Commissioner Zonka, it was just a couple of weeks between that and the office  
was filled by Governor DeSantis; he would remind Commissioners that the office would be  
vacant until November when the swearing in is, the third Tuesday of November; if the Governor  
appoints someone earlier than that, the Commissioner can appoint their own staff members at  
that time; and he is open to direction and ideas.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she wants to bring forward that when former Commissioner  
Lober happened, there was no chance given for him to provide any input or bring this  
conversation up due to the way that situation happened, his quick exit; Commissioner Zonka is  
the one who brought it up for her staff; she just wants to throw it out there that she was willing  
to bring this up and was told that the County Manager was bringing it up; she is wondering why  
that was the case when other Commissioners had been afforded the opportunity to make  
decisions about their office and she is not being afforded that same opportunity; Ms. Lortie has  
been someone that has been in her office and she has been incredible to not only herself but to  
the constituents; she almost never takes any time off; she is always there and professional; and  
she knows the community. She continued on by saying especially during this time of vacancy,  
she thinks that for District 1 it would be a good thing for them if they had a familiar face in her  
office because they have already built the relationships, she has done the work; that would be  
her recommendation to retain Ms. Lortie; when the new Commissioner comes in, there is some  
cohesive change of power and whatnot; and at that time the new Commissioner can make their  
own decision about staff.  
Chair Altman asked if there was any other discussion and if not he thinks that Commissioner  
Delaney should put that in the form of a motion; he noted he thinks the reason staff brought this  
forward is appropriate because they acknowledge they are not the one to make this decision  
that it has to come from the Board itself; and if staff is looking for direction, the Board needs to  
give it.  
Commissioner Feltner asked in lieu of some motion today, what happens then.  
Morris Richardson, County Attorney, stated first of all the Commissioner is the appointing  
authority until May 2; the Board cannot do anything that is effective immediately; the Board can  
only do something effective following that; following that the Board…  
Chair Altman interjected by saying the Board does not have to take action today, it can bring it  
up after the May 2 timeframe.  
Attorney Richardson advised the Board can take action today, bring it up at the next meeting  
on May 5, or however the Board wishes to proceed.  
Commissioner Delaney stated the issue would be that May 2, if her understanding is correct,  
because she is no longer here, it would also take away her appointment because it is a point of  
service position; she asked if that is correct; and she pointed out between May 2 and May 5,  
her constituents would not have anybody in the office to answer the phones.  
Attorney Richardson stated he thinks because her term does not expire on May 2, she is just  
leaving the office, he thinks at that point the Board becomes the appointing authority, and  
because Ms. Lortie has already been appointed, she would continue on until the Board takes  
other action, or appoints someone else as the appointing authority to take other action.  
Chair Altman inquired if the Board did nothing, nothing changes.  
Attorney Richardson stated if the Board did nothing, nothing changes with regard to Ms.  
Lortie’s position.  
Chair Altman stated right.  
Commissioner Feltner stated the Board could revisit it at the May 5 meeting.  
Chair Altman stated if the Board chose.  
Commissioner Delaney stated her only thing is that if there is something different that is going  
to happen, she would respectfully request that the Board do a kindness and not leave this  
hanging because it has already been brought up now; and she thinks it is only fair, and imagine  
if it was one of the other Commissioner’s Chief of Staff not knowing.  
Commissioner Feltner stated he would like to split something; as part of this today the Board  
could give direction today for a formal letter to be sent to the Governor requesting that an  
interim appointment be made; and the Board does not have to weigh in on who or what.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she does not agree with that at all.  
Commissioner Feltner asked an interim appointment.  
Commissioner Delaney asked to her seat.  
Commissioner Feltner stated whether the Governor is going to pick someone to serve in the  
role or not…  
Chair Altman stated he thinks that is an excellent idea.  
Commissioner Delaney commented she does not think this Board should be saying who should  
be sitting in her seat.  
Chair Altman noted he does not think Commissioner Feltner said who.  
Commissioner Feltner stated no, not at all.  
Chair Altman commented he just thinks the Board needs to let the Governor know.  
Commissioner Feltner noted he thinks there is a question of whether the Governor will, he  
certainly can.  
Commissioner Delaney interjected by saying historically he has not done that.  
Commissioner Feltner inquired he has not done that.  
Commissioner Delaney reiterated he has not done that historically.  
Commissioner Feltner advised they did do it with Commissioner Zonka.  
Commissioner Delaney stated right, but to look across the State historically, he knows this…  
Commissioner Feltner stated no, actually he does not, respectfully, he does not have to; he  
thinks there is a question of shall; and he inquired if it states the Governor shall appoint. He  
continued by saying to rephrase, the appointment, if there is one, is the Governor’s to make.  
Attorney Richardson stated it is the Governor’s to make; the Constitution and the statutory do  
use the mandatory language, “shall”, but that does not mean there will be an appointment.  
Chair Altman stated that is an interesting legal question because he agrees with Commissioner  
Feltner; he trusts the Governor…  
Commissioner Delaney interjected by saying my constituents do not want an appointment from  
the Governor, she is just going to put that out there.  
Chair Altman interjected by saying to let him finish; this is before the Board and it is improper  
for the public to be interrupting as well as each other; do not talk over each other…  
Commissioner Delaney interrupted by saying if the Board is doing…  
Chair Altman interjected by saying let him finish his point; and he stated he agrees with  
Commissioner Feltner, he would love to see the Governor make this appointment, he does not  
think this seat should go vacant.  
Commissioner Feltner stated the Board could even split it another way.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she hopes everyone is seeing this at home.  
Chair Altman inquired if Commissioner Delaney is saying she does not want the Governor to  
appoint.  
Commissioner Delaney replied absolutely not, she wants the people of District 1 to decide who  
is there Commissioner, absolutely.  
Commissioner Feltner responded by saying respectfully they will decide that in November, that  
is going to happen.  
Commissioner Delaney stated it does not matter they still have to endure; this Board has no  
idea what the constituents have had to endure over these years; she asked why the Board  
thinks she was elected here; she advised she got elected because these people out here have  
not been listened to in decades; they do not trust the government; and she does not know how  
much more clearly people have to say that.  
Commissioner Feltner stated okay.  
Chair Altman stated the Governor also got elected overwhelming as well; and he thinks when  
the people…  
Commissioner Delaney interjected by saying if the Board were to poll her D1 constituents she  
can promise they do not want an appointment from the Governor.  
Chair Altman called on Commissioner Adkinson noted she has not had the floor.  
Commissioner Feltner stated he was just going to make one last suggestion then he will stop.  
Chair Altman stated okay.  
Commissioner Feltner stated the Board could just formally inquire whether an appointment is  
going to be made or not; if the Governor responds that one will not be made, with that  
information the Board can make a better decision on May 5; if he says an appointment is  
coming, then the Board can also make a decision on May 5 of what to do with the office; just  
having some directive from the Governor’s office on that question he thinks would be helpful for  
the Board; and having no answer from the Governor is difficult.  
Chair Altman stated he agrees, that is a good point.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she has something to add.  
Chair Altman stated let Commissioner Adkinson have a voice.  
Commissioner Adkinson stated for the record, and the Board, she also would not support  
requesting the Governor make an appointment to this Commission; and she wanted everybody  
to hear that.  
Commissioner Feltner reiterated that is fine, the Board could simply ask if one is going to  
happen; if one is going to happen okay; if one is not going to happen it is okay too; now the  
Board has the information to make a better decision; and that is all.  
Commissioner Delaney stated what is being talked about today and what the Board is given the  
opportunity to give direction on is her staff in her office; personally she does not think the Board  
should be bugging the Governor with this; she does not think the D1 constituents want an  
appointment from the Governor; she thinks it should just be left alone; what is being talked  
about today is who is going to answer the phones, handle constituent services, and things like  
that in her office between now and the third Tuesday of November; what her recommendation  
would be is to leave in place the person that her constituents know; and that would be her  
motion to leave Kristen Lortie as the point person for the District 1 office from now until the new  
Commissioner comes in.  
Motion dies for lack of a second.  
Commissioner Delaney stated she has another motion.  
Commissioner Adkinson stated she would like to make a motion that the Board bring this back  
to the May 5 meeting for discussion by the Board.  
Chair Altman asked if there is a second to that motion.  
Commissioner Feltner stated he seconds the motion.  
Commissioner Delaney requested discussion.  
Chair Altman called for discussion.  
Commissioner Delaney stated first she has one question; and she inquired if the Board has to  
allow for public input because it is making motions.  
Attorney Richardson stated not on this motion, if it is just being moved to May 5, it can have  
public input on May 5.  
Commissioner Delaney stated okay; one thing she would ask to consider because if the Board  
thought about it being one of their Chiefs of Staff, would he or she want their position to be  
unknown for another two and one-half weeks; she does not think it is fair or a kindness to her  
staff that has served this District loyally and fully; she really hopes this motion fails and the  
Board can continue further discussion today so that Ms. Lortie has some idea of what her  
future looks like; and that that does not have to hang over her head for a few more weeks.  
Chair Altman asked if there was any further debate; and he called the vote. He stated motion  
passes on a 4:1 vote.  
The Board continued consideration of options for manning the District 1 Office to the May 5,  
2026, meeting.  
Result: CONTINUED  
Mover: Kim Adkinson  
Seconder: Rob Feltner  
Ayes: Goodson, Adkinson, Feltner, and Altman  
Nay: Delaney  
L.3. Katie Delaney, Commissioner District 1  
Commissioner Delaney stated she has a question; and requested that she has her report last  
since this is her last meeting.  
Chair Altman obliged.  
L.6. Rob Feltner, Commissioner District 4  
Commissioner Feltner stated he has two things; and he mentioned the Board could ask the  
Chair to call the office of the Governor to ask if an appointment will be made.  
Chair Altman stated he does not think he needs Board approval to do that, any Commissioner  
can call the Governor’s office.  
Commissioner Feltner stated he thinks just trying to get an answer for the Board, a very simple  
answer; it is going to happen or it is not; the Board can…  
Chair Altman interjected by saying he is going to make that inquiry on a personal level.  
Commissioner Feltner stated alright that is good; finally, there is an art show at Wickham Park  
this weekend, and it is always a great one; and everyone should go to Wickham Park and look  
at the many artists who will be there this weekend.  
L.3. Katie Delaney, Commissioner District 1  
Commissioner Delaney stated she had a citizens engagement event the other day and it was  
really great; it was in the Space Coast Room where she went through and talked to the citizens  
from all over the County about how they get informed; they were walked through the County  
website and she helped them all find the Agenda, the backup documents, and all that stuff;  
there were about 20 people there and they were all excited to learn about this, so they could be  
more informed and engaged with the County government; and she has a Substack with the  
same information. She went on to say she is not going to play the video but there is a video on  
there that walks one through how to go through the calendar, the Agenda, and find the backup  
details so if anybody wants to get informed, all this information is out there; even though it  
takes a little finagling to get used to the website, it is not that hard; she knows there are loads  
of citizen advocates that would help walk anybody through; anyone could contact her and she  
will help anyone, even after she is no longer in Brevard; and people should definitely check out  
that Substack if they are interested because it will give that tutorial to walk right through the  
County’s website. She continued by saying she also wanted to give a shout out to Lieutenant  
Manley; there was a resident that has a situation going on and he went with her because there  
was a police report that needed to be made and she just needs to give him a shout out; and it  
is a very intense situation and just his professionalism, his care, and his concern for the  
resident in this situation, it is not every day that one has a Mayor, a Commissioner, and a  
Deputy in one’s living room, so she just wanted to give him that shout out for how fantastic he  
was and showing that resident that he really cared about the situation and the follow-through.  
She stated because this did not get to be brought up, she just wants to read a couple things  
and give a little explanation about why she brought back that financial transparency item; it is  
because the overwhelming feedback she received from the community; she received multiple  
phone calls after the last meeting in regards to that Item, just in shock; this one is from District  
1 and they are in support; this one is from Merritt Island and they were in some serious shock  
that the Item did not go forward; this one came to all the Board members emails, she thinks it  
was District 2 because Commissioner Goodson’s staff member responded to him; then this one  
is from Melbourne also supporting; another one from Melbourne; she does not know any of  
these people, except for one; and this is not like she galvanized people and asked them to  
email all the Commissioners. She mentioned this is just feedback from the people who were  
watching this meeting; she hopes and prays that this Board considers bringing this Item back  
forward and making this change because it will help people; she understands that the Board  
does not want the Agenda to be too lengthy, but people are really trying to figure out how to get  
informed; when one is not part of the government it is really difficult because he or she does  
not know who to call, contact, what to do, what websites are out there, or what resources are  
out there, people have no idea; and this is just one small thing that the Board could do to help  
its constituents get more informed. She stated just because she did not get to say it last  
meeting, she really appreciates staff; she knows at times she would ask for a lot and she really  
appreciates the hard work, the information, the kindness, and the patience that it has given her;  
to the Board, while they do not always agree all the time, it has truly been an honor to serve  
with all of them; she will always be praying for this Board and this community; and she thanked  
them again.  
Chair Altman thanked Commissioner Delaney for her willingness to serve; and he stated that  
will conclude the meeting and he will see everyone at 1:00 for the Budget Workshop.  
Commissioner Feltner stated if anyone has not been to the Olive Tree in Viera, today is a  
beautiful day and a great time to do it; and getting there before 11:30 a.m. means one can get  
a table and be back here by 1:00 p.m.  
Adjourn  
Upon consensus of the Board, the meeting adjourned at 10:17 a.m.  
ATTEST:  
_________________________  
RACHEL M. SADOFF, CLERK  
__________________________________  
THAD ALTMAN, CHAIR  
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS  
BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA